[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] xen/arm: vgic_migrate_irq: do not race against GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING
A potential race condition occurs when vgic_migrate_irq is called a second time, while GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is already set. In that case, vgic_migrate_irq takes a different vgic lock from gic_update_one_lr. vgic_migrate_irq running concurrently with gic_update_one_lr could cause data corruptions, as they both access the inflight list. This patch fixes this problem. In vgic_migrate_irq after setting the new vcpu target, it checks both GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING and GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE. If they are both set we can just return because we have already set the new target: when gic_update_one_lr reaches the GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING test, it will do the right thing. Otherwise, if GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is set but GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE is not, gic_update_one_lr is running at the very same time on another pcpu, so it just waits until it completes (GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING is cleared). Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 5 ++++- xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index 16bb150..a805300 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -508,10 +508,13 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i) * next pcpu, inflight is already cleared. No concurrent * accesses to inflight. */ smp_mb(); - if ( test_and_clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) ) + if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) ) { struct vcpu *v_target = vgic_get_target_vcpu(v, irq); irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor)); + /* Set the new affinity, then clear MIGRATING. */ + smp_mb(); + clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status); } } } diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c index a323e7e..9141b34 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c @@ -252,13 +252,25 @@ void vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct vcpu *new, spin_lock_irqsave(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags); write_atomic(t_vcpu, new->vcpu_id); - /* migration already in progress, no need to do anything */ - if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) ) + /* Set the new target, then check MIGRATING and VISIBLE, it pairs + * with the barrier in gic_update_one_lr. */ + smp_mb(); + + /* no need to do anything, gic_update_one_lr will take care of it */ + if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) && + test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) ) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags); return; } + /* gic_update_one_lr is currently running, wait until its completion */ + while ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING, &p->status) ) + { + cpu_relax(); + smp_rmb(); + } + if ( list_empty(&p->inflight) ) { irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(new->processor)); -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |