Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/03/17 10:41, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:53:52PM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
>> branch xen-unstable
>> xenbranch xen-unstable
>> job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm
>> testid xen-boot
>>
>> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
>> Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
>> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
>> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
>> Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
>>
>> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>>
>>   Bug is in tree:  xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
>>   Bug introduced:  c5b9805bc1f793177779ae342c65fcc201a15a47
>>   Bug not present: b199c44afa3a0d18d0e968e78a590eb9e69e20ad
>>   Last fail repro: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106324/
>>
>>
>>   commit c5b9805bc1f793177779ae342c65fcc201a15a47
>>   Author: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>   Date:   Wed Feb 22 14:38:06 2017 +0100
>>
>>       efi: create new early memory allocator
> Does anybody know why this still fails? Andrew applied a fix (workaround) for 
> this yesterday.

Bisection runs from before will still be running.  Also, the fix hasn't
passed staging yet.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel