[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: correct boot time cpu_data[] handling
>>> On 02.03.17 at 16:06, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/03/17 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't >> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved >> pointers. >> >> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x86: >> Fail CPU bringup cleanly if it cannot initialise HVM"), as Andrew >> Cooper has pointed out: c couldn't possibly equal &boot_cpu_data >> anymore. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > I was hoping to avoid fixing LMSLE this until I had enough CPUID > infrastructure in place to make it migration safe. > > OTOH, I can't really object to the patch either. > > Would you mind if we #if 0'd the LMSLE bit for now, to avoid introducing > a window where it definitely isn't migration safe? I can do this, albeit a little reluctantly. I'd prefer "if ( 0 && ...)" though, to keep the code getting seen by the parser. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |