Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/5] Refactor x86 domain builder

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 03.03.17 at 10:41, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Long term we want to separate different sets of guest supporting code. We 
> would
> like to have CONFIG_HVM and CONFIG_PV (maybe even CONFIG_PVH?).  I will start
> to dientangle Xen code component by component. This is also somewhat related 
> to
> the project to move PV interface inside a PVH container, which I plan to work
> on soon.
> 
> RFC because I would like to know whether I should start putting them into pv
> and hvm directory respectively.

Yes please, along the lines of an RFC patch Andrew had sent not sao
long ago.

> And I would also like to know the reception of
> the idea to disentangle Xen guest supporting code in general.

I think this is generally a good idea, provided it doesn't end up
requiring too many clumsy internal interfaces (e.g. when trying to
share code).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel