[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Mapping active GDT
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/11/2017 08:06 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 11/03/2017 03:58, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 03/10/2017 09:39 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> I am looking into GDT remap series [0] which crashes PV guests and it >>>> seems that the problem lies in the fact that we cannot establish new >>>> mapping to an already existing GDT. >>>> >>>> The mapping is created by >>>> >>>> +static inline void setup_fixmap_gdt(int cpu) >>>> +{ >>>> + __set_fixmap(get_cpu_gdt_ro_index(cpu), >>>> + __pa(get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu)), PAGE_KERNEL); >>>> +} >>>> >>>> with get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu) being the current GDT pointer. This results in >>>> >>>> (XEN) mm.c:2570:d94v0 Bad type (saw 5400000000000001 != exp >>>> 7000000000000000) for mfn 1538fb (pfn 3e809) >>>> (XEN) mm.c:1022:d94v0 Could not get page type PGT_writable_page >>>> (XEN) mm.c:1074:d94v0 Error getting mfn 1538fb (pfn 3e809) from L1 entry >>>> 80000001538fb063 for l1e_owner=94, pg_owner=94 >> The problem here is that you are trying to create a writeable mapping to >> the GDT frame. >> >> Allowing the guest writeable access would be a security hole, as it is >> trivial to escalate privilege under those circumstances. > > Right, and I saw the same failure symptoms (hypervisor errors) even when > I replaced PAGE_KERNEL with PAGE_KERNEL_RO. > > And then I realized that I was on a branch with other unrelated changes, > so I switched the branch and then things started to work. Thus my mea > culpa below. > So we are good? :) (Meaning I still need to push the fix for 32 bit but that's it). > -boris > >> >> ~Andrew >> >>>> (after a small change to xen_set_fixmap(), which I think was missing) >>>> >>>> Before I try to come up with a fix I wanted to check here to see if this >>>> (not being able to map active GDT) is indeed the case. >>> Uhm.. Nevermind. The change in xen_set_fixmap() is probably sufficient. >>> >>> I was working with wrong branch ;-( Sorry for the noise. >>> >>> -boris >>> >>>> -boris >>>> >>>> >>>> [0] >>>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-03/msg00869.html >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > -- Thomas _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |