[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Fix issues with zero-length records in migration v2
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:50:44PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/03/17 13:20, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On 21/07/16 18:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> This series is RFC because it has only had compile testing thusfar. > >> > >> On AMD hardware supporting Debug Extentions, migration of a PV guest > >> which is > >> not currently using Debug Extentions fails, as the save side writes a > >> X86_PV_VCPU_MSRS record with 0 content, which the receving side > >> chokes on. > >> > >> It was alway the intention that such a record would be omitted, but that > >> obviously didn't go as intended. > >> > >> Adjust the docs to clarify that such records should be omitted, but that > >> receving sides should tolerate their presence. > > > > Last December you requested this series to be a blocker for Xen 4.9 > > (see [1]). Do you have any update on the status? > > As previously identified, my opinion is that the code as presented in v1 > is correct, and there have been no reasonable arguments to the contrary. > > I can post v1 again, but it won't be altered. > What about the subthread starting from <22422.18745.380486.234849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ? > ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |