Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/18] xen/arm: Restore HCR_EL2 register

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Wei,
> 
> On 15/03/17 08:34, Wei Chen wrote:
> > On 2017/3/15 8:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Wei Chen wrote:
> > > > Different domains may have different HCR_EL2 flags. For example, the
> > > > 64-bit domain needs HCR_RW flag but the 32-bit does not need it. So
> > > > we give each domain a default HCR_EL2 value and save it in the VCPU's
> > > > context.
> > > > 
> > > > HCR_EL2 register has only one bit can be updated automatically without
> > > > explicit write (HCR_VSE). But we haven't used this bit currently, so
> > > > we can consider that the HCR_EL2 register will not be modified while
> > > > the guest is running. So save the HCR_EL2 while guest exiting to
> > > > hypervisor is not neccessary. We just have to restore this register for
> > > > each VCPU while leaving hypervisor.
> > > > 
> > > > We prefer to restore HCR_EL2 in leave_hypervisor_tail rather than in
> > > > ctxt_switch_to. Because the leave_hypervisor_tail is the closest place
> > > > to the exception return. In this case, we don't need to warrant the
> > > > HCR_EL2 will not be changed between ctxt_switch_to and exception return.
> > > 
> > > Please explain a bit better why it is good to restore HCR_EL2 in
> > > leave_hypervisor_tail. Why is it a good thing that is closer to the
> > > exception return? What can be the cause of a change in HCR_EL2?
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, I will try to improve it in next version. In current Xen code, I
> > can't see any code would change the HCR_EL2 between ctxt_switch_to and
> > return_from_trap. But my concern is that, in the future, if someone
> > want to insert some HCR_EL2 change code between them, we can't guarantee
> > he will restore correct HCR_EL2 value for current vcpu.
> 
> Well, the purpose of this series is to inject a virtual SError to the guest
> when a host SError is happening. The host SError will be received in the
> hypervisor whilst the vCPU is running and no context switch (e.g call to
> ctxt_switch) may happen if the scheduler decides to keep the vCPU running.
> 
> Also, one could argue that HCR_EL2 could be modified on-fly in the function
> but we may have other places in the future which will modify HCR_EL2. For
> instance, this would be the case when the monitor app will gain support of
> inspecting some registers.
> 
> So we want a single place to restore HCR_EL2. And leave_hypervisor_tail is the
> best place for that.

You say that we want a single place to restore HCR_EL2, but this patch
introduces two places, one is p2m_restore_state, the other is
leave_hypervisor_tail. Are you saying Wei should remove the HCR_EL2
restore in p2m_restore_state and just keep the one in
leave_hypervisor_tail? 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel