[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: sched: don't call hooks of the wrong scheduler via VCPU2OP



>>> On 16.03.17 at 22:30, <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,19 @@ static struct scheduler __read_mostly ops;
>            : (typeof((opsptr)->fn(opsptr, ##__VA_ARGS__)))0 )
>  
>  #define DOM2OP(_d)    (((_d)->cpupool == NULL) ? &ops : 
> ((_d)->cpupool->sched))
> -#define VCPU2OP(_v)   (DOM2OP((_v)->domain))
> +static inline struct scheduler* VCPU2OP(const struct vcpu *v)

The * and blank in the return type want to switch positions.

> +{
> +    struct domain *d = v->domain;
> +
> +    if ( likely(d->cpupool != NULL) )
> +        return d->cpupool->sched;
> +
> +    /* v->processor never changes for idle vcpus, so using it here is safe */
> +    if ( likely(is_idle_domain(d)) )
> +        return per_cpu(scheduler, v->processor);
> +    else
> +        return &ops;

Having read through the description, I don't think I can conclude
why using &ops here is correct (or at least benign). And even if
this was explained in the description, I think a brief comment
would be rather desirable here (the more that it having been
&ops implicitly was wrong before as per the description).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.