Re: [Xen-devel] question: xen/qemu - mmio mapping issues for device pass-through

["Xuquan (Quan Xu)" <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On March 20, 2017 3:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 20.03.17 at 02:58, <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On March 16, 2017 11:32 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 16.03.17 at 15:21, <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On March 16, 2017 10:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 16.03.17 at 14:55, <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> I try to pass-through a device with 8G large bar, such as nvidia
>>>>>> M60(note1, pci-e info as below). It takes about '__15 sconds__' to
>>>>>> update 8G large bar in QEMU::xen_pt_region_update()..
>>>>>> Specifically, it is xc_domain_memory_mapping() in
>>>xen_pt_region_update().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Digged into xc_domain_memory_mapping(), I find it mainly call
>>>>>> "do_domctl
>>>>>> （…case XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping…）"
>>>>>> to mapping mmio region.. of cause, I find out that this mapping
>>>>>> could take a while in the code comment below ' case
>>>>>XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping '.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my questions:
>>>>>> 1. could we make this mapping mmio region quicker?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your quick reply.
>>>>
>>>>>Yes, e.g. by using large (2M or 1G) pages. This has been on my todo
>>>>>list for quite a while...
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. if could not, does it limit by hardware performance?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm afraid I don't understand the question. If you mean "Is it
>>>>>limited by hw performance", then no, see above. If you mean "Does it
>>>>>limit hw performance", then again no, I don't think so (other than
>>>>>the effect of having more IOMMU translation levels than really
>>>>>necessary for such
>>>large a region).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, my question is  "Is it limited by hw performance"...
>>>>
>>>> I am much confused. why does this mmio mapping take a while?
>>>> I guessed it takes a lot of time to set up p2m / iommu entry. That's
>>>> why I ask "Is it limited by hw performance".
>>>
>>>Well, just count the number of page table entries and that of the
>>>resulting hypercall continuations. It's the sheer amount of work
>>>that's causing the slowness, together with the need for us to use
>>>continuations to be on the safe side. There may well be redundant TLB
>>>invalidations as well. Since we can do better (by using large
>>>pages) I wouldn't call this "limited by hw performance", but of course
>>>one may.
>>>
>>
>> I agree.
>> So far as I know, xen&qemu upstream doesn't support to pass-through
>> large bar (pci-e bar > 4G) device, such as nvidia M60, However cloud
>> providers may want to leverage this feature for machine learning .etc.
>> Is it on your TODO list?
>
>Is what on my todo list?

support to pass-through large bar (pci-e bar > 4G) device..

> I was assuming large BAR handling to work so far
>(Konrad had done some adjustments there quite a while ago, from all I recall).
>


_iirc_ what Konrad mentioned was using qemu-trad..


Quan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel