[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events
On 10/03/17 15:50, Vlad Ioan Topan wrote: > Adds monitor support for descriptor access events (reads & writes of > IDTR/GDTR/LDTR/TR) for the x86 architecture (VMX and SVM). > > Signed-off-by: Vlad Ioan Topan <itopan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> How much extra overhead does this typically give? (I am curious, more than anything else) > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > index ccfae4f..cfe5aa2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -3645,6 +3645,41 @@ gp_fault: > return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION; > } > > +int hvm_descriptor_access_intercept(uint64_t exit_info, uint64_t > exit_qualification, > + uint8_t descriptor, bool_t is_write) > +{ > + struct vcpu *v = current; > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + struct hvm_emulate_ctxt ctxt = {}; > + int rc; > + > + if ( d->arch.monitor.descriptor_access_enabled ) > + { > + ASSERT(v->arch.vm_event); > + hvm_monitor_descriptor_access(exit_info, exit_qualification, > descriptor, is_write); > + } > + else > + { > + hvm_emulate_init_once(&ctxt, NULL, guest_cpu_user_regs()); > + rc = hvm_emulate_one(&ctxt); > + switch ( rc ) > + { > + case X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE: > + hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, X86_EVENT_NO_EC); > + break; > + case X86EMUL_EXCEPTION: > + if ( ctxt.ctxt.event_pending ) You can drop this if(). The expected behaviour of x86_emulate() makes this true, and we now have an assertion to catch it being wrong. (I should update other areas of code). > + hvm_inject_event(&ctxt.ctxt.event); > + /* fall through */ > + default: > + hvm_emulate_writeback(&ctxt); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + return X86EMUL_OKAY; > +} > + > static bool is_cross_vendor(const struct x86_emulate_state *state, > const struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) > { > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 894d7d4..2b2d193 100644 > @@ -3369,6 +3384,33 @@ static void vmx_handle_xrstors(void) > domain_crash(current->domain); > } > > +static void vmx_handle_descriptor_access(uint32_t exit_reason) > +{ > + uint8_t instr_id; > + uint64_t instr_info; > + uint64_t exit_qualification; > + uint8_t descriptor = VM_EVENT_DESC_INVALID; > + > + __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION, &exit_qualification); > + __vmread(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO, &instr_info); Rather than all this hand decoding, can I ask you to introduce a structure like ept_qual_t? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |