[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 8/9] iommu: Split iommu_hwdom_init() into arch specific parts
>>> On 22.03.17 at 19:40, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 15.03.17 at 21:05, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c >>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c >>> @@ -177,36 +177,8 @@ void __hwdom_init iommu_hwdom_init(struct domain *d) >>> >>> register_keyhandler('o', &iommu_dump_p2m_table, "dump iommu p2m >>> table", > 0); >>> d->need_iommu = !!iommu_dom0_strict; >>> - if ( need_iommu(d) && !iommu_use_hap_pt(d) ) >>> - { >>> - struct page_info *page; >>> - unsigned int i = 0; >>> - int rc = 0; >>> >>> - page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list ) >>> - { >>> - unsigned long mfn = page_to_mfn(page); >>> - unsigned long gfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn); >>> - unsigned int mapping = IOMMUF_readable; >>> - int ret; >>> - >>> - if ( ((page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_count_mask) == 0) || >>> - ((page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask) >>> - == PGT_writable_page) ) >>> - mapping |= IOMMUF_writable; >>> - >>> - ret = hd->platform_ops->map_page(d, gfn, mfn, mapping); >>> - if ( !rc ) >>> - rc = ret; >>> - >>> - if ( !(i++ & 0xfffff) ) >>> - process_pending_softirqs(); >>> - } >>> - >>> - if ( rc ) >>> - printk(XENLOG_WARNING "d%d: IOMMU mapping failed: %d\n", >>> - d->domain_id, rc); >>> - } >>> + arch_iommu_hwdom_init(d); >> >> The code being moved from here has survived the previous separation >> of arch-independent from arch-specific code, and looking at the code >> I also can't immediately see what's x86-specific here, so please make >> the description explain why the code as is can't be used. > > You are right, there is nothing x86-specific here at first sight. > The reason why I moved this code to x86 folder is that we don't need > to retrieve IOMMU mappings on ARM this way. With need_iommu being > explicitly set at the hardware domain creation time > we just need to ask unshared IOMMU driver to allocate its page table > to be ready to receive and process IOMMU mappings from P2M code. > > Other points that had prevented me from using it as is. > If the hardware domain isn't 1:1 mapped we won't know gfn. IIRC, we > can find mfn by gfn for particular domain on ARM, but not vise versa. > Also this iommu_hwdom_init() is being called before allocating domain > memory on ARM. What is the point? > So, the d->page_list is empty during it execution. In which case the question even more so is - why move the code if it simply does nothing in your case? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |