[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: remove shadow dom0 command line option
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:09:43PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 24/03/17 18:07, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:51:41PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > >> It has been broken for years and couldn't possibly be configured after > >> 4045953. > >> > >> Remove code and documentation. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 13 +------------ > >> xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c | 10 +--------- > >> xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c | 5 ----- > >> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 3 +-- > >> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown > >> b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown > >> index bdbdb8a53b..f86b1bb7d2 100644 > >> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown > >> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown > >> @@ -652,11 +652,6 @@ restrictions set up here. Note that the values to be > >> specified here are > >> ACPI PXM ones, not Xen internal node numbers. `relaxed` sets up vCPU > >> affinities to prefer but be not limited to the specified node(s). > >> > >> -### dom0\_shadow > >> -> `= <boolean>` > >> - > >> -This option is deprecated, please use `dom0=shadow` instead. > >> - > >> ### dom0\_vcpus\_pin > >> > `= <boolean>` > >> > >> @@ -665,7 +660,7 @@ This option is deprecated, please use `dom0=shadow` > >> instead. > >> Pin dom0 vcpus to their respective pcpus > >> > >> ### dom0 > >> -> `= List of [ pvh | shadow ]` > >> +> `= List of [ pvh ]` > > > > The shadow option here needs to be kept, in case someone wants to create a > > PVHv2 Dom0 with shadow instead of hap. > > You can't change the meaning of "dom0=shadow" from "Make a PV dom0 > running in autotranslate mode" to "Make a PVH dom0 running in shadow > mode rather than HAP". :-) My thought as well. The semantics can't change. Shadow PVH dom0 is fine, but it should be added in another patch. Wei. > > -George > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |