[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 12/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow.
On 17-03-29 09:20:21, Yi Sun wrote: > On 17-03-28 06:20:48, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 28.03.17 at 13:59, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think we at least need a 'get_val()' hook. > > > > Of course. > > > > > I try to implement CAT/CDP hook. > > > Please help to check if this is what you thought. > > > > One remark below, but other than that - yes. > > > > > static void cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos, > > > enum cbm_type type, int flag, uint32_t *val) > > > { > > > *val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos]; > > > } > > > > > > static void l3_cdp_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos, > > > enum cbm_type type, int flag, uint32_t *val) > > > { > > > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA || flag == 0 ) > > > *val = get_cdp_data(feat, cos); > > > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE || flag == 1 ) > > > *val = get_cdp_code(feat, cos); > > > } > > > > Why the redundancy between type and flag? > > > For psr_get_val, upper layer input the cbm_type to get either DATA or CODE > value. For other cases, we use flag as cos_num index to get either DATA or > CODE. > Let me explain more to avoid confusion. For other cases, we use cos_num as index to get values from a feature. In these cases, we do not know the cbm_type of the feature. So, I use the cos_num as flag to make 'get_val' know which value should be returned. > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |