Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't leak PFEC_implict to guests

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 06.04.17 at 16:33, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/04/17 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Doing so may not only confuse them, but will - on VMX - lead to
>> VMRESUME failures. Add respective ASSERT()s where the fields get set
>> to guard against future similar issues (or - in the restore case -
>> fail the operation). In that latter code at once convert the mis-used
>> gdprintk() to dprintk(), as the vCPU of interest is not "current".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'd drop the unnecessary full stops from the printed text.

Oops - I didn't pay attention (and even copied them). Thanks for
spotting.

> Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel