Re: [Xen-devel] Status of our RCU subsystem

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.04.17 at 19:54, <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The end result *might* be that we end up with things that are called
> rcu_idle_enter/exit(), but that actually implement the proper handling
> of nohz_cpu_mask, but I'm not sure about this yet.

Indeed I think we should name the functions this way even if their
implementation (heavily) differs from Linux'es.

Thanks for doing this research as well as for your intention to address
the shortcomings.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel