[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/amd: don't set X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS if forced to zero
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:34:34PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > And what happens when there is a scheduling event right here? > __switch_to() will see X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS set and take a wrong > path. So the whole thing we're doing right now is wrong: set bit and then clear bit. We should not set the bit at all and there won't be any window to get it wrong. So can we do something like this instead: if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XENPV)) set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS); or is XENPV the wrong thing to test? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |