[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 01/34] ARM: vGIC: avoid rank lock when reading priority
Hi, On 06/19/2017 11:44 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Julien Grall wrote:Hi, On 14/06/17 18:55, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Andre, On 06/14/2017 05:51 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:When reading the priority value of a virtual interrupt, we were taking the respective rank lock so far. However for forwarded interrupts (Dom0 only so far) this may lead to a deadlock with the following call chain: - MMIO access to change the IRQ affinity, calling the ITARGETSR handler - this handler takes the appropriate rank lock and calls vgic_store_itargetsr() - vgic_store_itargetsr() will eventually call vgic_migrate_irq() - if this IRQ is already in-flight, it will remove it from the old VCPU and inject it into the new one, by calling vgic_vcpu_inject_irq() - vgic_vcpu_inject_irq will call vgic_get_virq_priority() - vgic_get_virq_priority() tries to take the rank lock - again! It seems like this code path has never been exercised before. Fix this by avoiding taking the lock in vgic_get_virq_priority() (like we do in vgic_get_target_vcpu()). Actually we are just reading one byte, and priority changes while interrupts are handled are a benign race that can happen on real hardware too. So it is safe to just prevent the compiler from reading from the struct more than once. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>As you mentioned in the cover letter, I think it would be good to get this fixed in Xen 4.9. Stefano what do you think?Yes, I think it makes sense. Do you release-ack it? Release-acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |