[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Don't BUG on CPU0 offlining
On 06/28/2017 06:31 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 06:39:30PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0 allows to offline CPU0 but Xen HVM guests BUG() in xen_teardown_timer(). Remove the BUG_ON(), this is probably a leftover from ancient times when CPU0 hotplug was impossible, it works just fine for HVM. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>Perhaps: BUG_ON(cpu == 0 && xen_pv_domain());Linus says no BUG_ONs :-) xen_pv_cpu_disable() has the following: if (cpu == 0) return -EBUSY; as a protection so we won't get to xen_teardown_timer() but if you think additional BUG_ON() protection is justified I'm definitely not against adding it. No, I don't think its needed. This should be handled at the appropriate level, not down in the timer handling. So: Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |