[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 06/18] xen/pvcalls: handle commands from the frontend



On 03/07/17 23:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> When the other end notifies us that there are commands to be read
> (pvcalls_back_event), wake up the backend thread to parse the command.
> 
> The command ring works like most other Xen rings, so use the usual
> ring macros to read and write to it. The functions implementing the
> commands are empty stubs for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 144 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> index e4c2e46..9e00971 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> @@ -47,16 +47,135 @@ struct pvcalls_fedata {
>       struct list_head socket_mappings;
>       struct radix_tree_root socketpass_mappings;
>       struct semaphore socket_lock;
> -     struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> -     struct work_struct register_work;
>  };
>  
> -static void pvcalls_back_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static int pvcalls_back_socket(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +             struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
>  {
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                             struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_release(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                             struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_bind(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                          struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_listen(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                            struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_accept(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                            struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_poll(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                          struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pvcalls_back_handle_cmd(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> +                                struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> +{
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     switch (req->cmd) {
> +     case PVCALLS_SOCKET:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_socket(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_CONNECT:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_connect(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_RELEASE:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_release(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_BIND:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_bind(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_LISTEN:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_listen(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_ACCEPT:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_accept(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     case PVCALLS_POLL:
> +             ret = pvcalls_back_poll(dev, req);
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +     {
> +             struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata;
> +             struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> +
> +             fedata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +             rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(
> +                             &fedata->ring, fedata->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> +             rsp->req_id = req->req_id;
> +             rsp->cmd = req->cmd;
> +             rsp->ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +     }
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void pvcalls_back_work(struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata)
> +{
> +     int notify, notify_all = 0, more = 1;
> +     struct xen_pvcalls_request req;
> +     struct xenbus_device *dev = fedata->dev;
> +
> +     while (more) {
> +             while (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS(&fedata->ring)) {
> +                     RING_COPY_REQUEST(&fedata->ring,
> +                                       fedata->ring.req_cons++,
> +                                       &req);
> +
> +                     if (!pvcalls_back_handle_cmd(dev, &req)) {
> +                             RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(
> +                                     &fedata->ring, notify);
> +                             notify_all += notify;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +
> +             if (notify_all) {
> +                     notify_remote_via_irq(fedata->irq);
> +                     notify_all = 0;
> +             }
> +
> +             RING_FINAL_CHECK_FOR_REQUESTS(&fedata->ring, more);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static irqreturn_t pvcalls_back_event(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  {
> +     struct xenbus_device *dev = dev_id;
> +     struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata = NULL;
> +
> +     if (dev == NULL)
> +             return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +     fedata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +     if (fedata == NULL)
> +             return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +     pvcalls_back_work(fedata);
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -87,18 +206,15 @@ static int backend_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>               goto error;
>       }
>  
> -     err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler(dev->otherend_id, evtchn,
> -                                                 pvcalls_back_event, 0,
> -                                                 "pvcalls-backend", dev);
> +     err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irq(dev->otherend_id, evtchn);
>       if (err < 0)
>               goto error;
>       fedata->irq = err;
> -
> -     fedata->wq = alloc_workqueue("pvcalls_back_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
> -     if (!fedata->wq) {
> -             err = -ENOMEM;
> +     
> +     err = request_threaded_irq(fedata->irq, NULL, pvcalls_back_event,
> +                                IRQF_ONESHOT, "pvcalls-back", dev);
> +     if (err < 0)
>               goto error;
> -     }
>  
>       err = xenbus_map_ring_valloc(dev, &ring_ref, 1, (void**)&fedata->sring);
>       if (err < 0)
> @@ -107,7 +223,6 @@ static int backend_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>       BACK_RING_INIT(&fedata->ring, fedata->sring, XEN_PAGE_SIZE * 1);
>       fedata->dev = dev;
>  
> -     INIT_WORK(&fedata->register_work, pvcalls_back_work);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fedata->socket_mappings);
>       INIT_RADIX_TREE(&fedata->socketpass_mappings, GFP_KERNEL);
>       sema_init(&fedata->socket_lock, 1);
> @@ -116,15 +231,14 @@ static int backend_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>       down(&pvcalls_back_global.frontends_lock);
>       list_add_tail(&fedata->list, &pvcalls_back_global.frontends);
>       up(&pvcalls_back_global.frontends_lock);
> -     queue_work(fedata->wq, &fedata->register_work);
> +
> +     pvcalls_back_work(fedata);

Is this call really necessary? I believe this is racy in case an event
is coming in at the same time.

>  
>       return 0;
>  
>   error:
>       if (fedata->sring != NULL)
>               xenbus_unmap_ring_vfree(dev, fedata->sring);
> -     if (fedata->wq)
> -             destroy_workqueue(fedata->wq);
>       unbind_from_irqhandler(fedata->irq, dev);

Is it secure to unbind the irq handler _after_ unmapping the ring?


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.