[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [XenSummit 2017] Notes from the PVH toolstack interface session
On 07/17/2017 04:08 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XenSummit 2017] Notes from the PVH > toolstack interface session"): >> On 17/07/17 10:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> kernel = "<path>" >>> ramdisk = "<path>" >>> cmdline = "<string>" >>> >>> <path>: relative or full path in the filesystem. >> >> Please can xl or libxl's (not entirely sure which) path handling be >> fixed as part of this work. As noted in >> http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/xtf/index.html#errata, path handling is >> inconsistent as to whether it allows paths relative to the .cfg file. >> All paths should support being relative to the cfg file, as that is the >> most convenient for the end user to use. > > Domain config files are conventionally in /etc. It does not make > sense to look for images there. I never put them there. But anyone who does put them there will be using absolute paths. Having non-absolute paths be relative to the cfg file makes it easier for people to put config files somewhere *outside* of /etc. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |