Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/11] x86/pci: introduce hvm_pci_decode_addr

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 14.08.17 at 16:28, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,25 @@ void register_g2m_portio_handler(struct domain *d)
>      handler->ops = &g2m_portio_ops;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned int hvm_pci_decode_addr(unsigned int cf8, unsigned int addr,
> +                                 unsigned int *bus, unsigned int *slot,
> +                                 unsigned int *func)
> +{
> +    unsigned long bdf;

Is there a need for this being unsigned long instead of unsigned int?
If not, I'd be fine changing this while committing.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel