[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reset creation_finished flag on soft reset



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Vitaly Kuznetsov
> Sent: 05 September 2017 17:49
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu
> <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tim
> (Xen.org) <tim@xxxxxxx>; George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson
> <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reset creation_finished flag on soft
> reset
> 
> Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I wonder whether the easiest thing to do would be to modify qemu trad
> >> > to do explicit ioreq server creation? It's really not that much
> >> > code-change... 20-30 lines or so.
> >>
> >> I was thinking about this too, I'll try. It will hopefuly allow to get
> >> rid of the 'side effect' which creates default ioreq server on HVM
> >> parameters read.
> >
> > Yes indeed. At that point I'd actually propose getting rid of those params
> altogether since nothing will use them anymore.
> >
> 
> And in addition to that we don't need the concept of
> 'default_ioreq_server' and special pathes for it all over the code. That
> would be ideal, but:
> 
> I tried switching qemu-traditional to the new API and even succeeded,
> everything including pci pass-through seems to work. However, I'm not
> anywhere close to '20-30 lines' -- it's an order of magnitude more :-)
> 

Well, the compat code does rather bloat it but I guess it is probably 
necessary. Xen has had ioreq servers for a long time but probably not long 
enough.

> Anyway, here is the patch (attached). If everyone agrees the change is
> appropriate for qemu-traditional I can sent it out. No additional
> changes to the hypervisor is required.
> 

LGTM so I think it's worth sending out.

Cheers,

  Paul

> --
>   Vitaly


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.