[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] xen-pci-passthrough PCI Express support? (Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] pci: Add INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE to Conventional PCI devices)
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:12:34AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:33:57AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 27.09.17 at 21:56, <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt.c > > > +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt.c > > > @@ -964,6 +964,10 @@ static const TypeInfo xen_pci_passthrough_info = { > > > .instance_size = sizeof(XenPCIPassthroughState), > > > .instance_finalize = xen_pci_passthrough_finalize, > > > .class_init = xen_pci_passthrough_class_init, > > > + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) { > > > + { INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE }, > > > + { }, > > > + }, > > > }; > > > > Passed through devices can be both PCI and PCIe, so following > > the description of the patch I don't think these can be statically > > given either property. Granted quite a bit of PCIe specific > > functionality may be missing in the Xen code ... > > This is just static data about what the device type supports, not > about what a given device instance really is. Deciding if the > device is PCIe or Conventional at runtime is out of the scope of > this series. > > That said, if passed through PCI Express devices are really > supported, it looks like this should be marked as hybrid. Can anybody confirm if PCI Express devices are really supported by xen-pci-passthrough? I suggest we add only INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE to the class info until we confirm that. (In other words, apply this patch as-is, and add INTERFACE_PCIE_DEVICE later as a follow-up patch if appropriate.) -- Eduardo _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |