[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2 for-4.10] xen/arm: guest_walk: Fix check again the IPS
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Sergej Proskurin wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On 10/11/2017 04:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > > On 11/10/17 15:51, Sergej Proskurin wrote: > >> Hi Julien, > > > > Hi, > > > >> On 10/11/2017 04:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > >>> The function get_ipa_output_size is check whether the input size > >>> configured by the guest is valid and will return it. > >>> > >>> The check is done with the IPS already shifted against > >>> TCR_EL1_IPS_48_BIT. However the constant has been defined with the > >>> shift included, resulting the check always been false. > >>> > >>> Fix it by doing the check on the non-shifted value. > >>> > >>> This was introduced by commit 7d623b358a "arm/mem_access: Add > >>> long-descriptor > >>> based gpt" introduced software page-table walk for stage-1. > >>> > >>> Note that the IPS code is now surrounded with #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 > >>> because the Arm32 compiler will complain of shift bigger than the width > >>> of the variable. This is fine as the code is executed for 64-bit > >>> domain only. > >> > >> This is a bit controversial as compared to your review comments to the > >> initial implementation. You did not want to see any #define > >> CONFIG_ARM_64 within the code. TCR_EL1 is a 64-bit Register: to prevent > >> compilation issues for Aarch32 systems, why don't you use uint64_t for > >> ips instead of register_t? > > > > I am fully aware what I said in the previous reviews and I still took > > this decision because you will mix uint64_t and register_t. #ifdef > > CONFIG_ARM_64 is much nicer than mixing types. > > > > Another way to fix it would be to rework completely the way you did > > introduce TCR_EL1_IPS_*_BIT so you stick with non-shifted value rather > > than shifted one. > > > > But I don't have time for that and I don't want to see a latent security > > bug in the release. > > > > Cheers, > > > >> Thanks, > >> ~Sergej > >> > >>> > >>> Coverity-ID: 1457707 > >>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > > Reviewed-by: Sergej Proskurin <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Sergej, Julien. The patch is committed. > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Cc: Sergej Proskurin <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Changes in v2: > >>> - Fix compilation on Arm32 > >>> --- > >>> xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c | 8 +++++--- > >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c b/xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c > >>> index c38bedcf65..4d1ea0cdc1 100644 > >>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c > >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/guest_walk.c > >>> @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ static int guest_walk_sd(const struct vcpu *v, > >>> static int get_ipa_output_size(struct domain *d, register_t tcr, > >>> unsigned int *output_size) > >>> { > >>> - unsigned int ips; > >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 > >>> + register_t ips; > >>> static const unsigned int ipa_sizes[7] = { > >>> TCR_EL1_IPS_32_BIT_VAL, > >>> @@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ static int get_ipa_output_size(struct domain *d, > >>> register_t tcr, > >>> if ( is_64bit_domain(d) ) > >>> { > >>> /* Get the intermediate physical address size. */ > >>> - ips = (tcr & TCR_EL1_IPS_MASK) >> TCR_EL1_IPS_SHIFT; > >>> + ips = tcr & TCR_EL1_IPS_MASK; > >>> /* > >>> * Return an error on reserved IPA output-sizes and if the IPA > >>> @@ -211,9 +212,10 @@ static int get_ipa_output_size(struct domain *d, > >>> register_t tcr, > >>> if ( ips > TCR_EL1_IPS_48_BIT ) > >>> return -EFAULT; > >>> - *output_size = ipa_sizes[ips]; > >>> + *output_size = ipa_sizes[ips >> TCR_EL1_IPS_SHIFT]; > >>> } > >>> else > >>> +#endif > >>> *output_size = TCR_EL1_IPS_40_BIT_VAL; > >>> return 0; > >> > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |