[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 08/16] x86: implement set value flow for MBA
>>> On 13.10.17 at 10:41, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -274,16 +280,18 @@ static enum psr_feat_type psr_type_to_feat_type(enum > psr_type type) > return feat_type; > } > > -static bool psr_check_cbm(unsigned int cbm_len, unsigned long cbm) > +/* Implementation of allocation features' functions. */ > +static bool cat_check_cbm(const struct feat_node *feat, uint32_t *val) > { > unsigned int first_bit, zero_bit; > + unsigned int cbm_len = feat->cat.cbm_len; > + unsigned long cbm = *val; These are necessary changes. > - /* Set bits should only in the range of [0, cbm_len]. */ > - if ( cbm & (~0ul << cbm_len) ) > - return false; > - > - /* At least one bit need to be set. */ > - if ( cbm == 0 ) > + /* > + * Set bits should be only in the range of [0, cbm_len). > + * And, at least one bit need to be set. > + */ > + if ( (cbm & (~0ul << cbm_len)) || !cbm ) But all of this doesn't really belong here. I don't outright object to you leaving it the way it is, but I'd prefer if you dropped these changes, or moved them to a separate patch if you think this is worthwhile. > @@ -501,6 +511,35 @@ static bool mba_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node > *feat, > static void mba_write_msr(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val, > enum psr_type type) > { > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_MBA_MASK(cos), val); > +} > + > +static bool mba_sanitize_thrtl(const struct feat_node *feat, uint32_t *thrtl) > +{ > + if ( *thrtl > feat->mba.thrtl_max ) > + return false; > + > + /* > + * Per SDM (chapter "Memory Bandwidth Allocation Configuration"): > + * 1. Linear mode: In the linear mode the input precision is defined > + * as 100-(MBA_MAX). For instance, if the MBA_MAX value is 90, the > + * input precision is 10%. Values not an even multiple of the > + * precision (e.g., 12%) will be rounded down (e.g., to 10% delay > + * applied). > + * 2. Non-linear mode: Input delay values are powers-of-two from zero > + * to the MBA_MAX value from CPUID. In this case any values not a > + * power of two will be rounded down the next nearest power of two. > + */ > + if ( feat->mba.linear ) > + *thrtl -= *thrtl % (100 - feat->mba.thrtl_max); > + else > + { > + /* Not power of 2. */ > + if ( *thrtl & (*thrtl - 1) ) > + *thrtl &= 1 << (flsl(*thrtl) - 1); fls() will do now that the parameter type is uint32_t. Also why do you think &= is better than plain = here? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |