|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 08/16] x86: implement set value flow for MBA
>>> On 13.10.17 at 10:41, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -274,16 +280,18 @@ static enum psr_feat_type psr_type_to_feat_type(enum
> psr_type type)
> return feat_type;
> }
>
> -static bool psr_check_cbm(unsigned int cbm_len, unsigned long cbm)
> +/* Implementation of allocation features' functions. */
> +static bool cat_check_cbm(const struct feat_node *feat, uint32_t *val)
> {
> unsigned int first_bit, zero_bit;
> + unsigned int cbm_len = feat->cat.cbm_len;
> + unsigned long cbm = *val;
These are necessary changes.
> - /* Set bits should only in the range of [0, cbm_len]. */
> - if ( cbm & (~0ul << cbm_len) )
> - return false;
> -
> - /* At least one bit need to be set. */
> - if ( cbm == 0 )
> + /*
> + * Set bits should be only in the range of [0, cbm_len).
> + * And, at least one bit need to be set.
> + */
> + if ( (cbm & (~0ul << cbm_len)) || !cbm )
But all of this doesn't really belong here. I don't outright object to
you leaving it the way it is, but I'd prefer if you dropped these
changes, or moved them to a separate patch if you think this is
worthwhile.
> @@ -501,6 +511,35 @@ static bool mba_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node
> *feat,
> static void mba_write_msr(unsigned int cos, uint32_t val,
> enum psr_type type)
> {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_MBA_MASK(cos), val);
> +}
> +
> +static bool mba_sanitize_thrtl(const struct feat_node *feat, uint32_t *thrtl)
> +{
> + if ( *thrtl > feat->mba.thrtl_max )
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Per SDM (chapter "Memory Bandwidth Allocation Configuration"):
> + * 1. Linear mode: In the linear mode the input precision is defined
> + * as 100-(MBA_MAX). For instance, if the MBA_MAX value is 90, the
> + * input precision is 10%. Values not an even multiple of the
> + * precision (e.g., 12%) will be rounded down (e.g., to 10% delay
> + * applied).
> + * 2. Non-linear mode: Input delay values are powers-of-two from zero
> + * to the MBA_MAX value from CPUID. In this case any values not a
> + * power of two will be rounded down the next nearest power of two.
> + */
> + if ( feat->mba.linear )
> + *thrtl -= *thrtl % (100 - feat->mba.thrtl_max);
> + else
> + {
> + /* Not power of 2. */
> + if ( *thrtl & (*thrtl - 1) )
> + *thrtl &= 1 << (flsl(*thrtl) - 1);
fls() will do now that the parameter type is uint32_t.
Also why do you think &= is better than plain = here?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |