[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 v2] passthrough/vtd: Don't DMA to the stack in queue_invalidate_wait()
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2017 1:55 AM > > On 20/10/17 08:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 19.10.17 at 18:22, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> DMA-ing to the stack is generally considered bad practice. In this case, > >> if > a > >> timeout occurs because of a sluggish device which is processing the > request, > >> the completion notification will corrupt the stack of a subsequent > deeper call > >> tree. > >> > >> Place the poll_slot in a percpu area and DMA to that instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Please could you extend the commit message to state the issue > > remaining with using a single per-CPU slot? With that > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > How about this? > > Note: This change does not address other issues with the current > implementation, such as once a timeout has been suffered, subsequent > completions can't be correlated with their requests. > Can you increase the poll data +1 every time when a new wait comes? Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |