[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/7] xsm: flask: change the dummy xsm policy and flask hook for map_gmfn_foregin
>>> On 22.10.17 at 13:21, <blackskygg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How about changing the policy to (c over d) && ((d over t) || (c over t))? > Given that (c over d) is a must, which is always checked somewhere higher > in the call stack as Daniel pointed out, permitting (d over t) or (c > over t) actually infers > permitting the other. > > - if you permit (d over t) but not (c over t): > Given (c over t), > (c) can first map the src page from (t) into its own memory space and then > map > this page from its own memory space to (d)'s memory space. Would that work? The page, when in (c)'s space, is still owned by (t), so I don't see how mapping into (d)'s space could become possible just because it's mapped into (c)'s. > - if you permit (c over t) but not (d over t): > Given (d over t), > (c) can first map (d)'s pages into its own memory space and modify (d)'s > code > to issues a hypercall that maps (t)'s memory pages into (d)'s memory space. I can buy this one (after having thought about it a little only for now), albeit (c) modifying code in (d) is certainly something I'd call abuse rather than use of permissions. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |