[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] xen/time: do not decrease steal time after live migration on xen
On 27/10/17 09:16, Dongli Zhang wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On 10/25/2017 11:12 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 10/25/2017 02:45 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote: >>> After guest live migration on xen, steal time in /proc/stat >>> (cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL]) might decrease because steal returned by >>> xen_steal_lock() might be less than this_rq()->prev_steal_time which is >>> derived from previous return value of xen_steal_clock(). >>> >>> For instance, steal time of each vcpu is 335 before live migration. >>> >>> cpu 198 0 368 200064 1962 0 0 1340 0 0 >>> cpu0 38 0 81 50063 492 0 0 335 0 0 >>> cpu1 65 0 97 49763 634 0 0 335 0 0 >>> cpu2 38 0 81 50098 462 0 0 335 0 0 >>> cpu3 56 0 107 50138 374 0 0 335 0 0 >>> >>> After live migration, steal time is reduced to 312. >>> >>> cpu 200 0 370 200330 1971 0 0 1248 0 0 >>> cpu0 38 0 82 50123 500 0 0 312 0 0 >>> cpu1 65 0 97 49832 634 0 0 312 0 0 >>> cpu2 39 0 82 50167 462 0 0 312 0 0 >>> cpu3 56 0 107 50207 374 0 0 312 0 0 >>> >>> Since runstate times are cumulative and cleared during xen live migration >>> by xen hypervisor, the idea of this patch is to accumulate runstate times >>> to global percpu variables before live migration suspend. Once guest VM is >>> resumed, xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu() would always return the sum of new >>> runstate times and previously accumulated times stored in global percpu >>> variables. >>> >>> Similar and more severe issue would impact prior linux 4.8-4.10 as >>> discussed by Michael Las at >>> https://0xstubs.org/debugging-a-flaky-cpu-steal-time-counter-on-a-paravirtualized-xen-guest, >>> which would overflow steal time and lead to 100% st usage in top command >>> for linux 4.8-4.10. A backport of this patch would fix that issue. >>> >>> References: >>> https://0xstubs.org/debugging-a-flaky-cpu-steal-time-counter-on-a-paravirtualized-xen-guest >>> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> --- >>> Changed since v1: >>> * relocate modification to xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu >>> >>> Changed since v2: >>> * accumulate runstate times before live migration >>> >>> --- >>> drivers/xen/manage.c | 1 + >>> drivers/xen/time.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 + >>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/manage.c b/drivers/xen/manage.c >>> index c425d03..9aa2955 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c >>> +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c >>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static int xen_suspend(void *data) >>> } >>> >>> gnttab_suspend(); >>> + xen_accumulate_runstate_time(); >>> xen_arch_pre_suspend(); >>> >>> /* >>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/time.c b/drivers/xen/time.c >>> index ac5f23f..6df3f82 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/xen/time.c >>> +++ b/drivers/xen/time.c >>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ >>> /* runstate info updated by Xen */ >>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_runstate_info, xen_runstate); >>> >>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64[4], old_runstate_time); >>> + >>> /* return an consistent snapshot of 64-bit time/counter value */ >>> static u64 get64(const u64 *p) >>> { >>> @@ -52,6 +54,7 @@ static void xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu(struct >>> vcpu_runstate_info *res, >>> { >>> u64 state_time; >>> struct vcpu_runstate_info *state; >>> + int i; >>> >>> BUG_ON(preemptible()); >>> >>> @@ -64,6 +67,22 @@ static void xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu(struct >>> vcpu_runstate_info *res, >>> rmb(); /* Hypervisor might update data. */ >>> } while (get64(&state->state_entry_time) != state_time || >>> (state_time & XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE)); >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) >>> + res->time[i] += per_cpu(old_runstate_time, cpu)[i]; >>> +} >>> + >>> +void xen_accumulate_runstate_time(void) >>> +{ >>> + struct vcpu_runstate_info state; >>> + int cpu; >>> + >>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { >>> + xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu(&state, cpu); >>> + memcpy(per_cpu(old_runstate_time, cpu), >>> + state.time, >>> + 4 * sizeof(u64)); >> >> sizeof(old_runstate_time). (I think this should work for per_cpu variables) >> >>> + } >> >> Hmm.. This may not perform as intended if we are merely checkpointing >> (or pausing) the guest (i.e. if HYPERVISOR_suspend() returns 1). We will >> double-account for the last interval that the guest has run. >> >> I'd rather not have yet another per-cpu variable but I can't think of >> anything else. Perhaps you or others can come up with something better. > > I have 3 options so far. > > The 1st option is to another per-cpu variable while you do not like it. > > The 2nd option is to borrow from what do_stolen_accounting() used to do. > Compute > the delta of current and previous time and do nothing if delta is less than 0. > The drawback of this option is guest might wait for the new time to catch up > with previous time. This could be a rather long time. I don't think this is the way to go. > The 3rd option is to check the return value of HYPERVISOR_suspend() to > different > if this is a migration of checkpointing. As we will double-account the > runstate > time for checkpointing, why not just divide it by 2? The drawback of this > option > is the result is not accurate as we divide the incremental (time before and > after checkpointing) by 2. And it is wrong if you do multiple migrations. > Would you please let me know which option we prefer? Perhaps option 4: Allocate a buffer at suspend time for the times to add up and do the correction after suspend and free the buffer again. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |