[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/vpmu: Remove unnecessary call to do_interrupt()
On 25/10/17 11:30, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 25/10/17 00:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:This call was left during PVHv1 removal (commit 33e5c32559e1 ("x86: remove PVHv1 code")): - if ( is_pvh_vcpu(sampling) && - !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) && + if ( !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) && !vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_interrupt(regs) ) return; As result of this extra call VPMU no longer works for PV guests on Intel because we effectively lose value of MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>--- This should also go into 4.9Agreed, and therefore makes it a 4.10 candidate at this point. Release-acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, ~Andrewxen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c index fd2fcac..7baf461 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c @@ -227,10 +227,6 @@ void vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) if ( !vpmu->xenpmu_data ) return;- if ( !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&- !vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_interrupt(regs) ) - return; - if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CACHED) ) return;_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |