[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] aarch64: advertise the GIC system register interface
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 31 October 2017 at 18:51, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 31 October 2017 at 17:01, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > Fixing QEMU is harder than I expected. Would it be possible to update > >> > id_aa64pfr0 at CPU reset time? Like cpu->id_aa64pfr0 |= 0x01000000; ? > >> > >> At that point we've already called register_cp_regs_for_features(), > >> which is where we read cpu->id_aa64pfr0 when we're creating the > >> cpreg. So if you change it after that it's too late. But that > >> function is called at CPU realize time, which is before we've > >> created the GIC object... > > > > What about something along the lines of > > > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > > index 9e18b41..0851071 100644 > > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > > @@ -1401,6 +1400,10 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > > object_property_set_link(cpuobj, OBJECT(secure_sysmem), > > "secure-memory", &error_abort); > > } > > + if (vms->gic_version == 3) { > > + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cpuobj); > > + cpu->id_aa64pfr0 |= 0x01000000; > > + } > > > > object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, true, "realized", NULL); > > object_unref(cpuobj); > > Definitely not -- the virt board should not be poking about inside the > internals of the CPU object. > > The slightly cleaned up version of this idea is that you give the > CPU an object property for "claim the GICv3 registers exist in the > ID registers" and have virt.c set it. That feels like an ugly > workaround for something we really ought not to have to tell the > board about at all, though. Something like the following? diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index 9e18b41..369d36b 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) object_property_set_link(cpuobj, OBJECT(secure_sysmem), "secure-memory", &error_abort); } + if (vms->gic_version == 3) { + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, true, "gicv3-sysregs", NULL); + } object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, true, "realized", NULL); object_unref(cpuobj); diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c index 88578f3..259cad1 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.c +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c @@ -1690,6 +1690,7 @@ static Property arm_cpu_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mp-affinity", ARMCPU, mp_affinity, ARM64_AFFINITY_INVALID), DEFINE_PROP_INT32("node-id", ARMCPU, node_id, CPU_UNSET_NUMA_NODE_ID), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("gicv3-sysregs", ARMCPU, gicv3_sysregs, false), DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() }; diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index 89d49cd..0015b37 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ struct ARMCPU { /* Should CPU start in PSCI powered-off state? */ bool start_powered_off; + /* GICv3 sysregs present */ + bool gicv3_sysregs; + /* Current power state, access guarded by BQL */ ARMPSCIState power_state; diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 37af750..6f21900 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -4687,7 +4687,8 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu) { .name = "ID_AA64PFR0_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64, .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 4, .opc2 = 0, .access = PL1_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, - .resetvalue = cpu->id_aa64pfr0 }, + .resetvalue = cpu->gicv3_sysregs ? (cpu->id_aa64pfr0|0x01000000) : + cpu->id_aa64pfr0 }, { .name = "ID_AA64PFR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64, .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 4, .opc2 = 1, .access = PL1_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |