[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 for-next 0/4] xen: Convert __page_to_mfn and _mfn_to_page to use typesafe MFN
- To: "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:12:38 -0700
- Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>, Shane Wang <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gang Wei <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:12:59 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 09.11.17 at 16:48, <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/11/17 15:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 09.11.17 at 16:39, <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> What I meant is you would replace the 4 occurrences by
>>> mfn_to_page(_mfn(...)). If you are happy with that, then fine.
>>
>> Oh, sure, that's a fine intermediate state, which we have all over
>> the place right now. It's clear that it'll take a while to fully carry
>> through typesafeness to everywhere.
>
> Would you be fine with other part of Xen too? If so, I can have a go at
> removing completely __page_to_mfn/__mfn_to_page.
Oh, if you want to go that extra mile, that's certainly fine with me.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
