[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mm: fix a potential race condition in map_pages_to_xen().
>>> On 10.11.17 at 08:18, <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -4844,9 +4844,19 @@ int map_pages_to_xen( > { > unsigned long base_mfn; > > - pl1e = l2e_to_l1e(*pl2e); > if ( locking ) > spin_lock(&map_pgdir_lock); > + > + /* Skip the re-consolidation if it's done on another CPU. */ > + if ( l2e_get_flags(*pl2e) & _PAGE_PSE ) > + { > + if ( locking ) > + spin_unlock(&map_pgdir_lock); > + goto check_l3; > + } > + > + ol2e = *pl2e; This wants moving up ahead of the if(), so you can use the local variable inside that if(). > @@ -4880,6 +4889,15 @@ int map_pages_to_xen( > > if ( locking ) > spin_lock(&map_pgdir_lock); > + > + /* Skip the re-consolidation if it's done on another CPU. */ > + if ( l3e_get_flags(*pl3e) & _PAGE_PSE ) > + { > + if ( locking ) > + spin_unlock(&map_pgdir_lock); > + continue; > + } > + > ol3e = *pl3e; Same here - move the if() below here and use ol3e in there. With that Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> I'm not certain this is important enough a fix to consider for 4.10, and you seem to think it's good enough if this gets applied only after the tree would be branched, as you didn't Cc Julien. Please indicate if you actually simply weren't aware, and you indeed there's an important aspect to this that I'm overlooking. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |