Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/16] SUPPORT.md: Add ARM-specific virtual hardware

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi George,

On 13/11/17 15:41, George Dunlap wrote:
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Do we need to add anything more here?
>
> And do we need to include ARM ACPI for guests?
I don't have any opinion here. However, if we decide to include, then we 
should also include Device-Tree.
> CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   SUPPORT.md | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md
> index b95ee0ebe7..8235336c41 100644
> --- a/SUPPORT.md
> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
> @@ -412,6 +412,16 @@ Virtual Performance Management Unit for HVM guests
>   Disabled by default (enable with hypervisor command line option).
>   This feature is not security supported: see 
> http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-163.html
>   
> +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
> +
> +    Status: Supported
> +
> +### ARM: 16K and 64K page granularity in guests
> +
> +    Status: Supported, with caveats
> +
> +No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain.
> +
>   ## Virtual Hardware, QEMU
>   
>   These are devices available in HVM mode using a qemu devicemodel (the default).
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel