[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 10/16 RESEND] rbtree: coding style adjustments
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> Set comment and indentation style to be consistent with linux coding style and the rest of the file, as suggested by Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Linux commit 7ce6ff9e5de99e7b72019c7de82fb438fe1dc5a0] Ported to Xen. Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> --- xen/common/rbtree.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/rbtree.c b/xen/common/rbtree.c index 0ad1a1455d..b964171bee 100644 --- a/xen/common/rbtree.c +++ b/xen/common/rbtree.c @@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ void rb_erase(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root) child = node->rb_right; else if (!node->rb_right) child = node->rb_left; - else - { + else { struct rb_node *old = node, *left; node = node->rb_right; @@ -406,17 +405,15 @@ void rb_erase(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root) if (child) rb_set_parent(child, parent); - if (parent) - { + if (parent) { if (parent->rb_left == node) parent->rb_left = child; else parent->rb_right = child; - } - else + } else root->rb_node = child; - color: +color: if (color == RB_BLACK) __rb_erase_color(child, parent, root); } @@ -458,8 +455,10 @@ struct rb_node *rb_next(const struct rb_node *node) if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) return NULL; - /* If we have a right-hand child, go down and then left as far - as we can. */ + /* + * If we have a right-hand child, go down and then left as far + * as we can. + */ if (node->rb_right) { node = node->rb_right; while (node->rb_left) @@ -467,12 +466,13 @@ struct rb_node *rb_next(const struct rb_node *node) return (struct rb_node *)node; } - /* No right-hand children. Everything down and left is - smaller than us, so any 'next' node must be in the general - direction of our parent. Go up the tree; any time the - ancestor is a right-hand child of its parent, keep going - up. First time it's a left-hand child of its parent, said - parent is our 'next' node. */ + /* + * No right-hand children. Everything down and left is smaller than us, + * so any 'next' node must be in the general direction of our parent. + * Go up the tree; any time the ancestor is a right-hand child of its + * parent, keep going up. First time it's a left-hand child of its + * parent, said parent is our 'next' node. + */ while ((parent = rb_parent(node)) && node == parent->rb_right) node = parent; @@ -487,8 +487,10 @@ struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *node) if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) return NULL; - /* If we have a left-hand child, go down and then right as far - as we can. */ + /* + * If we have a left-hand child, go down and then right as far + * as we can. + */ if (node->rb_left) { node = node->rb_left; while (node->rb_right) @@ -496,8 +498,10 @@ struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *node) return (struct rb_node *)node; } - /* No left-hand children. Go up till we find an ancestor which - is a right-hand child of its parent */ + /* + * No left-hand children. Go up till we find an ancestor which + * is a right-hand child of its parent + */ while ((parent = rb_parent(node)) && node == parent->rb_left) node = parent; -- 2.13.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |