Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PV seems to be broken on Linus' tree

[Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm doing:
>>
>> /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine accel=kvm:tcg -cpu host -net none
>> -nographic -kernel xen-4.8.2 -initrd './arch/x86/boot/bzImage' -m 2G
>> -smp 2 -append console=com1
>>
>> With Linus' commit c8a0739b185d11d6e2ca7ad9f5835841d1cfc765 and the
>> attached config.
>>
>> It dies with a bunch of sensible log lines and then:
>>
>> (XEN) d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6, ec=0000]
>> (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fault at ffff82d08023961a
>> entry.o#create_bounce_frame+0x137/0x146
>> (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
>> (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.8.2  x86_64  debug=n   Not tainted ]----
>> (XEN) CPU:    0
>> (XEN) RIP:    e033:[<ffffffff811226eb>]
>> (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000296   EM: 1   CONTEXT: pv guest (d0v0)
>> (XEN) rax: 000000000000002f   rbx: ffffffff81e65a48   rcx: ffffffff81e71288
>> (XEN) rdx: ffffffff81e27500   rsi: 0000000000000001   rdi: ffffffff81133f88
>> (XEN) rbp: 0000000000000000   rsp: ffffffff81e03e78   r8:  0000000000000000
>> (XEN) r9:  0000000000000001   r10: 0000000000000000   r11: 0000000000000000
>> (XEN) r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000001   r14: 0000000000000001
>> (XEN) r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 000000008005003b   cr4: 00000000003506e0
>> (XEN) cr3: 000000007b0b3000   cr2: 0000000000000000
>> (XEN) ds: 0000   es: 0000   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: e02b   cs: e033
>> (XEN) Guest stack trace from rsp=ffffffff81e03e78:
>> (XEN)    ffffffff81e71288 0000000000000000 ffffffff811226eb 000000010000e030
>> (XEN)    0000000000010096 ffffffff81e03eb8 000000000000e02b ffffffff811226eb
>> (XEN)    ffffffff81122c2e 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> (XEN)    0000000000000030 ffffffff81c69cf5 ffffffff81080b20 ffffffff81080560
>> (XEN)    0000000000000000 ffffffff810d3741 ffffffff8107b420 ffffffff81094660
>>
>> Is this familiar?
>>
>> I'll feel really dumb if it ends up being my fault.
>
> Nah, it's broken at least back to v4.13, and I suspect it's config
> related.  objdump gives me this:
>
> ffffffff8112b0e1:       e9 e8 fe ff ff          jmpq
> ffffffff8112afce <check_flags.part.42+0x4e>
> ffffffff8112b0e6:       48 c7 c6 2d f8 c8 81    mov    
> $0xffffffff81c8f82d,%rsi
> ffffffff8112b0ed:       48 c7 c7 58 b9 c8 81    mov    
> $0xffffffff81c8b958,%rdi
> ffffffff8112b0f4:       e8 13 2d 01 00          callq  ffffffff8113de0c 
> <printk>
> ffffffff8112b0f9:       0f ff                   (bad)   <-- crash here
>
> That's "ud0", which is used by WARN.  So we're probably hitting an
> early warning and Xen probably has something busted with early
> exception handling.
>
> Anyone want to debug it and fix it?

Well, I think I debugged it.  x86_64 has a shiny function
idt_setup_early_handler(), and Xen doesn't call it.  Fixing the
problem may be as simple as calling it at an appropriate time and
doing whatever asm magic is needed to deal with Xen's weird IDT
calling convention.

--Andy

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel