[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] core: mount xenfs, ignore proc-xen.mount (#6442, #6662)
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:11:45AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 01.12.17 at 12:48, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Suppose at one point we split hardware domain and control domain, which > > one will you call Dom0? Which one will get the flag? > > There can only be one hardware domain, which will continue to > be the one getting XENFEAT_dom0. There could be any number > of control domains (perhaps with some coordination between > them). > Right. So XENFEAT_dom0 is not really what Olaf needs. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |