[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() has no need to know of XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range
On 06/12/17 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > As its name says, it handles a single GMFN only anyway. Note that ARM > needs no adjustment, as it doesn't handle the two types at all. > > Also take the opportunity and clean up the handling of XENMAPSPACE_gmfn > a little: There's no point in going through "idx" when capturing the MFN. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> This looks to be based on some of your other mm cleanup, which isn't yet in staging. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |