Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 01/11] x86: implement get hw info flow for MBA

[Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17-12-20 03:32:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.12.17 at 01:42, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/Config.mk
> > +++ b/Config.mk
> > @@ -260,17 +260,17 @@ QEMU_TRADITIONAL_REVISION ?= $(QEMU_TAG)
> >  endif
> >  
> >  ifeq ($(GIT_HTTP),y)
> > -OVMF_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/ovmf.git 
> > -QEMU_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/qemu-xen.git 
> > -QEMU_TRADITIONAL_URL ?= 
> > http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/qemu-xen-traditional.git 
> > -SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/seabios.git 
> > -MINIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/mini-os.git 
> > +OVMF_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/git-http/ovmf.git 
> > +QEMU_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/git-http/qemu-xen.git 
> > +QEMU_TRADITIONAL_URL ?= 
> > http://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/git-http/qemu-xen-traditional.git 
> > +SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/git-http/seabios.git 
> > +MINIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= http://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/git-http/mini-os.git 
> >  else
> > -OVMF_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git
> > -QEMU_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
> > -QEMU_TRADITIONAL_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
> > -SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/seabios.git
> > -MINIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/mini-os.git
> > +OVMF_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/ovmf.git
> > +QEMU_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/qemu-xen.git
> > +QEMU_TRADITIONAL_URL ?= git://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/qemu-xen-traditional.git
> > +SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/seabios.git
> > +MINIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://vt-sync.sh.intel.com/mini-os.git
> >  endif
> >  OVMF_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= 947f3737abf65fda63f3ffd97fddfa6986986868
> >  QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= master
> 
> This is rather annoying: I ended up overlooking these changes
> (it was Andrew who has noticed them), attributing them to be
> part of the post description comments (they clearly didn't look
> like valid code changes). Please can you pay more attention to
> what you actually submit?
> 
Oh, that is my fault! Very sorry for this. :(

> Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel