Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/hvm: Add MSR old value

[Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/05/2017 11:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.12.17 at 16:45, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>  On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:50:57PM +0300, Alexandru Isaila wrote:
>>>> This patch adds the old value param and the onchangeonly option
>>>> to the VM_EVENT_REASON_MOV_TO_MSR event.
>>>>
>>>> The param was added to the vm_event_mov_to_msr struct and to the
>>>> hvm_monitor_msr function. Finally I've changed the bool_t param
>>>> to a bool for the hvm_msr_write_intercept function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since V1:
>>>>    - Removed Stray blanks inside the inner parentheses
>>>>    - Added space after the if statement
>>>>    - Added * 8 to the set/clear/test_bit statements
>>>>    - Removed the blank line after monitored_msr.
>>>> ---
>>>>  tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h     |  2 +-
>>>>  tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c          |  3 ++-
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Ping - AFAICT this patch has all the required acks?
> 
> Sure, and it is not being forgotten. But the tree is not fully open
> yet, so it is subject to the judgment of committers whether any
> patch (or series) is suitable of committing at this point. I did think
> about committing this patch yesterday, but decided against
> doing so. Please be a little more patient - even once the tree is
> fully open, a few working days should be allowed for everyone
> to deal with backlog, before sending pings.

Sorry for the previous early ping. Just to check: is there action
required on our part for this patch post-4.10 (rebasing, etc.)?


Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel