[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 23/25] x86/HVM: make use of new read-modify-write emulator hook
On 05/02/18 08:34, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 02.02.18 at 17:37, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 07/12/17 14:17, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> ..., at least as far as currently possible, i.e. when a mapping can be >>> obtained. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v3: New. >>> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c >>> @@ -1187,6 +1187,61 @@ static int hvmemul_write( >>> return X86EMUL_OKAY; >>> } >>> >>> +static int hvmemul_rmw( >>> + enum x86_segment seg, >>> + unsigned long offset, >>> + unsigned int bytes, >>> + uint32_t *eflags, >>> + struct x86_emulate_state *state, >>> + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) >>> +{ >>> + struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt = >>> + container_of(ctxt, struct hvm_emulate_ctxt, ctxt); >>> + unsigned long addr, reps = 1; >>> + uint32_t pfec = PFEC_page_present | PFEC_write_access; >> Drop present, and... > See reply to previous patch. > >>> + struct hvm_vcpu_io *vio = ¤t->arch.hvm_vcpu.hvm_io; >>> + int rc; >>> + void *mapping; >>> + >>> + rc = hvmemul_virtual_to_linear( >>> + seg, offset, bytes, &reps, hvm_access_write, hvmemul_ctxt, &addr); >>> + if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY || !bytes ) >>> + return rc; >>> + >>> + if ( is_x86_system_segment(seg) ) >>> + pfec |= PFEC_implicit; >>> + else if ( hvmemul_ctxt->seg_reg[x86_seg_ss].dpl == 3 ) >>> + pfec |= PFEC_user_mode; >>> + >>> + mapping = hvmemul_map_linear_addr(addr, bytes, pfec, hvmemul_ctxt); >>> + if ( IS_ERR(mapping) ) >>> + return ~PTR_ERR(mapping); >>> + >>> + if ( mapping ) >>> + { >>> + rc = x86_emul_rmw(mapping, bytes, eflags, state, ctxt); >>> + hvmemul_unmap_linear_addr(mapping, addr, bytes, hvmemul_ctxt); >>> + } >>> + else >>> + { >>> + unsigned long data = 0; >>> + bool_t known_gpfn = vio->mmio_access.write_access && >>> + vio->mmio_gla == (addr & PAGE_MASK); >> ... bool here. > Oops. > >> Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks, but due to the first of the two requests you'll need to let > me know whether this applies with just the second change done. I'll accept the consistency argument and let the first one go. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |