[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen: xenbus_dev_frontend: Fix XS_TRANSACTION_END handling
On 12/02/18 09:49, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 07/02/18 23:22, Simon Gaiser wrote: >> Commit fd8aa9095a95 ("xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple >> concurrent xenstore accesses") made a subtle change to the semantic of >> xenbus_dev_request_and_reply() and xenbus_transaction_end(). >> >> Before on an error response to XS_TRANSACTION_END >> xenbus_dev_request_and_reply() would not decrement the active >> transaction counter. But xenbus_transaction_end() has always counted the >> transaction as finished regardless of the response. > > Which is correct now. Xenstore will free all transaction related > data regardless of the response. A once failed transaction can't > be repaired, it has to be repeated completely. > > The real problem is decrementing the counter when XS_TRANSACTION_END > for a non-existing transaction is being sent. > >> The new behavior is that xenbus_dev_request_and_reply() and >> xenbus_transaction_end() will always count the transaction as finished >> regardless the response code (handled in xs_request_exit()). > > ENOENT should not decrement the transaction counter, while all > other responses to XS_TRANSACTION_END should still do so. Sorry, I stand corrected: the ENOENT case should never happen, as this case is tested in xenbus_write_transaction(). It doesn't hurt to test for ENOENT, though. What should be handled is EINVAL: this would happen if a user specified a string different from "T" and "F". Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |