[Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c

between commit:

  a9a08845e9ac ("vfs: do bulk POLL* -> EPOLL* replacement")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  1e7dbff356e5 ("pvcalls-front: introduce a per sock_mapping refcount")

from the xen-tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 753d9cb437d0,ca5b77309c7d..000000000000
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@@ -963,20 -942,13 +942,13 @@@ __poll_t pvcalls_front_poll(struct fil
  {
        struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
        struct sock_mapping *map;
 -      int ret;
 +      __poll_t ret;
  
-       pvcalls_enter();
-       if (!pvcalls_front_dev) {
-               pvcalls_exit();
+       map = pvcalls_enter_sock(sock);
+       if (IS_ERR(map))
 -              return POLLNVAL;
 +              return EPOLLNVAL;
-       }
        bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
  
-       map = (struct sock_mapping *) sock->sk->sk_send_head;
-       if (!map) {
-               pvcalls_exit();
-               return EPOLLNVAL;
-       }
        if (map->active_socket)
                ret = pvcalls_front_poll_active(file, bedata, map, wait);
        else

Attachment: pgpDgxFgOLjRb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel