[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] x86/msr: add Raw and Host domain policies



On 16/02/18 11:31, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 16.02.18 at 11:33, <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 08.02.18 at 11:23, <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>   uint64_t val;
>>>>> + int rc;
>>>>>  
>>>>> - if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_INTEL_PLATFORM_INFO, val) ||
>>>>> + if ((rc = rdmsr_safe(MSR_INTEL_PLATFORM_INFO, val)) == 0)
>>>>> + {
>>>>> +         dp->plaform_info.available = true;
>>>>> +         if (val & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULTING)
>>>>> +                 dp->plaform_info.cpuid_faulting = true;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rc ||
>>>>>       !(val & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULTING) ||
>>>>>       rdmsr_safe(MSR_INTEL_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES,
>>>>>                  this_cpu(msr_misc_features)))
>>>> Below here we have
>>>>
>>>>            setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULTING);
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't this be reflected in the host policy?
>>> I guess the correct thing to do for now for host_msr_domain_policy is:
>>>
>>>     dp->plaform_info.cpuid_faulting = cpu_has_cpuid_faulting;
>>>     
>>> Looking at the code, calculate_pv_max_policy() will be simplified with
>>> the above change: pv_max_msr_domain_policy will become a copy of host
>>> policy.
>>>
>>> This actually brings a question: what to do about per-pCPU MSRs in the
>>> context of MSR policy?
>> How does per-pCPU-ness of an MSR affect the policy? Are you
>> thinking of CPUs with different capabilities? We assume all CPUs
>> are identical in many other places.
> Yes, CPUs are assumed to be identical. But currently Xen checks
> the presence of MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES (which is a per-pCPU msr)
> on the boot CPU, and it affects X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULTING. Which
> in it's turn affects the presence of MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES for PV vCPUs.
>
> So the actual question is: where to store the availability of
> MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES (and possibly other per-pCPU msrs in the future)
> and is it even needed to do so?

Store it in one single host policy.

Part of my CPUID work will be cleaning up some of these warts in the
detection logic.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.