[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 12/17] xen/arm: vpsci: Remove parameter 'ver' from do_common_cpu
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Julien Grall wrote: > Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending > on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the > specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1: > > - x0/r0 can be updated on PSCI 0.1 because general purpose registers > are undefined upon CPU on. > - PSCI 0.1 does not defined PSCI_ALREADY_ON. However, it would be > safer to bail out if the CPU is already on. > > Based on this, the parameter 'ver' is removed and do_psci_cpu_on > (implementation for PSCI 0.1) is adapted to avoid returning > PSCI_ALREADY_ON. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr.babchuk@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > The reviewed-by was kept despite move this patch towards the end > of the series because there was no clash with the rest of the series. > > Changes in v2: > - Move the patch towards the end of the series as not strictly > necessary for SP2. > - Add Volodymyr's reviewed-by > --- > xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c > index 19ee7caeb4..7ea3ea58e3 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > #include <public/sched.h> > > static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, register_t entry_point, > - register_t context_id,int ver) > + register_t context_id) > { > struct vcpu *v; > struct domain *d = current->domain; > @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, > register_t entry_point, > if ( is_64bit_domain(d) && is_thumb ) > return PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; > > - if ( (ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2)) && > - !test_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags) ) > + if ( !test_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags) ) > return PSCI_ALREADY_ON; > > if ( (ctxt = alloc_vcpu_guest_context()) == NULL ) > @@ -55,18 +54,21 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, > register_t entry_point, > ctxt->ttbr0 = 0; > ctxt->ttbr1 = 0; > ctxt->ttbcr = 0; /* Defined Reset Value */ > + > + /* > + * x0/r0_usr are always updated because for PSCI 0.1 the general > + * purpose registers are undefined upon CPU_on. > + */ > if ( is_32bit_domain(d) ) > { > ctxt->user_regs.cpsr = PSR_GUEST32_INIT; > - if ( ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2) ) > - ctxt->user_regs.r0_usr = context_id; > + ctxt->user_regs.r0_usr = context_id; > } > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 > else > { > ctxt->user_regs.cpsr = PSR_GUEST64_INIT; > - if ( ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2) ) > - ctxt->user_regs.x0 = context_id; > + ctxt->user_regs.x0 = context_id; > } > #endif > > @@ -93,7 +95,14 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, > register_t entry_point, > > static int32_t do_psci_cpu_on(uint32_t vcpuid, register_t entry_point) > { > - return do_common_cpu_on(vcpuid, entry_point, 0 , PSCI_VERSION(0, 1)); > + int32_t ret; > + > + ret = do_common_cpu_on(vcpuid, entry_point, 0); > + /* > + * PSCI 0.1 does not define the return code PSCI_ALREADY_ON. > + * Instead, return PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS. > + */ > + return (ret == PSCI_ALREADY_ON) ? PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS : ret; > } > > static int32_t do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state) > @@ -137,8 +146,7 @@ static int32_t do_psci_0_2_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, > register_t entry_point, > register_t context_id) > { > - return do_common_cpu_on(target_cpu, entry_point, context_id, > - PSCI_VERSION(0, 2)); > + return do_common_cpu_on(target_cpu, entry_point, context_id); > } > > static const unsigned long target_affinity_mask[] = { > -- > 2.11.0 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |