[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 08/28] x86/vvtd: Add MMIO handler for VVTD
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:20:12PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:51:29PM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 01:21:09AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 04:39:15PM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> >On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:22:15PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > >> >> This patch adds VVTD MMIO handler to deal with MMIO access. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> v4: > >> >> - only trap the register emulated in vvtd_in_range(). > >> >> i.e. replace PAGE_SIZE with the VVTD_MAX_OFFSET > >> >> --- > >> >> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vvtd.c | 55 > >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vvtd.c > >> >> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vvtd.c > >> >> index 9f76ccf..d78d878 100644 > >> >> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vvtd.c > >> >> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/vvtd.c > >> > > >> >Now that I look at this, this is the wrong folder. This should be in > >> >xen/arch/x86/hvm with the rest of the emulated devices. > >> > >> It is a problem we discussed in previous versions. AMD puts its vIOMMU > >> (iommu_guest.c) in xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/. We are following what > >> they did. I don't have special taste on this. If no one objects to your > >> suggestion, I will move it to xen/arch/x86/hvm/. Maybe create a new > >> intel directory since it's intel-specific and won't be used by AMD. > > > >Oh, it's been quite some time since I've reviewed that, so TBH I > >didn't remember that discussion. > > > >If the AMD viommu thing is already there I guess it doesn't hurt... > >Also, have you checked whether it can be converted to use the > >infrastructure that you add here? > > Not yet. It seems that we have no method to use AMD vIOMMU now. > And I notice that Wei plans to remove AMD vIOMMU. > > I can convert AMD vIOMMU implementation to use this infrastructure if we > finally decide to preserve AMD vIOMMU. Oh, OK, I had no idea we where planning to remove the AMD vIOMMU stuff. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |