|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 25/49] ARM: new VGIC: Add GICv2 world switch backend
Hi,
On 13/02/18 14:31, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/02/18 14:39, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Processing maintenance interrupts and accessing the list registers
>> are dependent on the host's GIC version.
>> Introduce vgic-v2.c to contain GICv2 specific functions.
>> Implement the GICv2 specific code for syncing the emulation state
>> into the VGIC registers.
>> This also adds the hook to let Xen setup the host GIC addresses.
>>
>> This is based on Linux commit 140b086dd197, written by Marc Zyngier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 261
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 20 ++++
>> xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 8 ++
>> 3 files changed, 289 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..10fc467ffa
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2015, 2016 ARM Ltd.
>> + * Imported from Linux ("new" KVM VGIC) and heavily adapted to Xen.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <asm/arm_vgic.h>
>> +#include <asm/bug.h>
>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <xen/sched.h>
>> +#include <xen/sizes.h>
>> +
>> +#include "vgic.h"
>> +
>> +#define GICH_ELRSR0 0x30
>> +#define GICH_ELRSR1 0x34
>> +#define GICH_LR0 0x100
>> +
>> +#define GICH_LR_VIRTUALID (0x3ff << 0)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT (10)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID (0x3ff <<
>> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT 23
>> +#define GICH_LR_STATE (3 << 28)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT (1 << 28)
>> +#define GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT (1 << 29)
>> +#define GICH_LR_EOI (1 << 19)
>> +#define GICH_LR_HW (1 << 31)
>
> Can we define them in either in gic.h or a new header gic-v2.h?
Yes, but they clash with some ill-named GICv3 LR bits. So expect another
patch which renames GICH_LR_STATE_SHIFT to ICH_LR_STATE_SHIFT. Which is
the actual spec name for that system register in GICv3, there is no
GICH_LR_ with the GICv3 bit positions.
>> +
>> +static struct {
>> + bool enabled;
>> + paddr_t dbase; /* Distributor interface address */
>> + paddr_t cbase; /* CPU interface address & size */
>> + paddr_t csize;
>> + paddr_t vbase; /* Virtual CPU interface address */
>> + void __iomem *hbase; /* Hypervisor control interface */
>> +
>> + /* Offset to add to get an 8kB contiguous region if GIC is
>> aliased */
>> + uint32_t aliased_offset;
>> +} gic_v2_hw_data;
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_setup_hw(paddr_t dbase, paddr_t cbase, paddr_t csize,
>> + paddr_t vbase, void __iomem *hbase,
>> + uint32_t aliased_offset)
>> +{
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.enabled = true;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.dbase = dbase;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.cbase = cbase;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.csize = csize;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.vbase = vbase;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.hbase = hbase;
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.aliased_offset = aliased_offset;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_set_underflow(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + gic_hw_ops->update_hcr_status(GICH_HCR_UIE, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * transfer the content of the LRs back into the corresponding ap_list:
>> + * - active bit is transferred as is
>> + * - pending bit is
>> + * - transferred as is in case of edge sensitive IRQs
>> + * - set to the line-level (resample time) for level sensitive IRQs
>> + */
>> +void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>
> I am wondering how much we could share this code with
> vgic_v3_fold_lr_state.
I think we discussed this and dismissed the idea:
- The actual LR encoding is much different between GICv3 and GICv2, up
to the point where we have some fields in one which are not in the
other. That really clutters the code.
- Originally this function was much shorter and didn't have that many
special cases. So the code duplication was really minimal.
I see your point, but don't really want to go there now for two reasons:
- It is probably nasty to implement, since we always have to check which
GIC we are running on when masking the LR value.
- It would deviate further from the KVM implementation, in a core
function. For any bugs introduced we are on our own here.
I will try to bring this up with the KVM people, to see whether it's
worth to revisit this decision. There is indeed quite some code
duplication these days.
But this may come as an optimization later.
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>> + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpuif = &vgic_cpu->vgic_v2;
>> + int lr;
>
> unsigned please.
>
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + cpuif->vgic_hcr &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
>> +
>> + for ( lr = 0; lr < vgic_cpu->used_lrs; lr++ )
>> + {
>> + u32 val = cpuif->vgic_lr[lr];
>> + u32 intid = val & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
>> + struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +
>> + irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->domain, vcpu, intid);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + /* Always preserve the active bit */
>> + irq->active = !!(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
>> +
>> + /* Edge is the only case where we preserve the pending bit */
>> + if ( irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE && (val &
>> GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) )
>> + {
>> + irq->pending_latch = true;
>> +
>> + if ( vgic_irq_is_sgi(intid) )
>> + {
>> + u32 cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
>> +
>> + cpuid >>= GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>> + irq->source |= (1 << cpuid);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> May I ask to keep the big comments from KVM around? It looks quite
> useful to have it.
Indeed I somehow lost that. Added now.
>> + if ( irq->hw && irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL &&
>
> You probably want to have the helper vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(...) as in
> KVM.
Yes.
Cheers,
Andre
>> + (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) )
>> + {
>> + irq->line_level = gic_read_pending_state(irq->hwintid);
>> +
>> + if ( !irq->line_level )
>> + gic_set_active_state(irq->hwintid, true);
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
>> + vgic_put_irq(vcpu->domain, irq);
>> + }
>> +
>> + vgic_cpu->used_lrs = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Populates the particular LR with the state of a given IRQ:
>> + * - for an edge sensitive IRQ the pending state is cleared in struct
>> vgic_irq
>> + * - for a level sensitive IRQ the pending state value is unchanged;
>> + * it is dictated directly by the input level
>> + *
>> + * If @irq describes an SGI with multiple sources, we choose the
>> + * lowest-numbered source VCPU and clear that bit in the source bitmap.
>> + *
>> + * The irq_lock must be held by the caller.
>> + */
>> +void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int
>> lr)
>
> I am wondering how much we could share this code with vgic_v3_populate_lr.
>
>> +{
>> + u32 val = irq->intid;
>> +
>> + if ( irq_is_pending(irq) )
>> + {
>> + val |= GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
>> +
>> + if ( irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE )
>> + irq->pending_latch = false;
>> +
>> + if ( vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) )
>> + {
>> + u32 src = ffs(irq->source);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!src);
>> + val |= (src - 1) << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>> + irq->source &= ~(1 << (src - 1));
>> + if ( irq->source )
>> + irq->pending_latch = true;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ( irq->active )
>> + val |= GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT;
>> +
>> + if ( irq->hw )
>> + {
>> + val |= GICH_LR_HW;
>> + val |= irq->hwintid << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>> + /*
>> + * Never set pending+active on a HW interrupt, as the
>> + * pending state is kept at the physical distributor
>> + * level.
>> + */
>> + if ( irq->active && irq_is_pending(irq) )
>> + val &= ~GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + if ( irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL )
>> + val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Level-triggered mapped IRQs are special because we only observe
>> + * rising edges as input to the VGIC. We therefore lower the line
>> + * level here, so that we can take new virtual IRQs. See
>> + * vgic_v2_fold_lr_state for more info.
>> + */
>> + if ( irq->hw && irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL &&
>
> Same remark for the helper.
>
>> + (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) )
>> + irq->line_level = false;
>> +
>> + /* The GICv2 LR only holds five bits of priority. */
>> + val |= (irq->priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] = val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_clear_lr(struct vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> +{
>> + vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void save_lrs(struct vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
>> + u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;
>> + u64 elrsr;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + elrsr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
>> + if ( unlikely(used_lrs > 32) )
>> + elrsr |= ((u64)readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1)) << 32;
>> +
>> + for ( i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++ )
>> + {
>> + if ( elrsr & (1UL << i) )
>> + cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
>> + else
>> + cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_LR0 + (i *
>> 4));
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(0, base + GICH_LR0 + (i * 4));
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_save_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;
>> +
>> + if ( used_lrs )
>> + {
>> + save_lrs(vcpu, gic_v2_hw_data.hbase);
>> + writel_relaxed(0, gic_v2_hw_data.hbase + GICH_HCR);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I am not entirely convinced that have a separate function to save the
> LRs is necessary. This could be done in fold_lr_state().
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_restore_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
>> + u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if ( used_lrs )
>> + {
>> + writel_relaxed(cpu_if->vgic_hcr,
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.hbase + GICH_HCR);
>> + for ( i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++ )
>> + writel_relaxed(cpu_if->vgic_lr[i],
>> + gic_v2_hw_data.hbase + GICH_LR0 + (i * 4));
>> + }
>
> Same here but with populate_lr_state(). This would make the code easier
> to follow and also avoid a lot ifery in the vgic.c code.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Local variables:
>> + * mode: C
>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>> + * End:
>> + */
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> index a1f77130d4..f4f2a04a60 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> @@ -488,6 +488,7 @@ retry:
>> static inline void vgic_fold_lr_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> + vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(vcpu);
>> }
>> /* Requires the irq_lock to be held. */
>> @@ -495,14 +496,18 @@ static inline void vgic_populate_lr(struct vcpu
>> *vcpu,
>> struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
>> {
>> ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
>> +
>> + vgic_v2_populate_lr(vcpu, irq, lr);
>> }
>> static inline void vgic_clear_lr(struct vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> {
>> + vgic_v2_clear_lr(vcpu, lr);
>> }
>> static inline void vgic_set_underflow(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> + vgic_v2_set_underflow(vcpu);
>> }
>> /* Requires the ap_list_lock to be held. */
>> @@ -573,6 +578,11 @@ next:
>> vgic_clear_lr(vcpu, count);
>> }
>> +static inline void vgic_save_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + vgic_v2_save_state(vcpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * gic_clear_lrs() - Update the VGIC state from hardware after a
>> guest's run.
>> * @vcpu: the VCPU.
>> @@ -592,11 +602,18 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> if ( list_empty(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head) )
>> return;
>> + vgic_save_state(vcpu);
>> +
>> if ( vgic_cpu->used_lrs )
>> vgic_fold_lr_state(vcpu);
>> vgic_prune_ap_list(vcpu);
>> }
>> +static inline void vgic_restore_state(struct vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + vgic_v2_restore_state(vcpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * gic_inject() - flush the emulation state into the hardware on
>> guest entry
>> *
>> @@ -625,7 +642,10 @@ void gic_inject(void)
>> spin_lock(¤t->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
>> vgic_flush_lr_state(current);
>> spin_unlock(¤t->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
>> +
>> + vgic_restore_state(current);
>> }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Local variables:
>> * mode: C
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> index 47fc58b81e..771ca6f046 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> @@ -41,4 +41,12 @@ static inline void vgic_get_irq_kref(struct
>> vgic_irq *irq)
>> atomic_inc(&irq->refcount);
>> }
>> +void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int
>> lr);
>> +void vgic_v2_clear_lr(struct vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
>> +void vgic_v2_set_underflow(struct vcpu *vcpu);
>> +
>> +void vgic_v2_save_state(struct vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void vgic_v2_restore_state(struct vcpu *vcpu);
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |