[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 26/49] ARM: new VGIC: Implement vgic_vcpu_pending_irq
Hi, On 02/26/2018 03:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: On 13/02/18 16:35, Julien Grall wrote:diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c index f4f2a04a60..9e7fb1edcb 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c @@ -646,6 +646,38 @@ void gic_inject(void) vgic_restore_state(current); } +static int vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct vcpu *vcpu) +{ + struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu; + struct vgic_irq *irq; + bool pending = false; + unsigned long flags; + + if ( !vcpu->domain->arch.vgic.enabled ) + return false; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock, flags); + + list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) + { + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock); + pending = irq_is_pending(irq) && irq->enabled; + spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock); + + if ( pending ) + break; + } + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock, flags); + + return pending; +} + +int gic_events_need_delivery(void)You probably want to rename that function or just expose vgic_vcpu_pending_irq().Rename to what? I need both functions: vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() is also called by vgic_kick_vcpus() (later in the series). And gic_events_need_delivery(void) is the interface that the arch code expects. Shall I rename this there? To what? Let me start with it is a bit odd to have a function name 'gic_*' in the virtual GIC code. So at least renaming to vgic_events_need_delivery would be an improvement. Regarding the interface itself, it is ARM specific and not set in stone. It would not be too bad to use vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(current). Is there any reason for not doing that? Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |