Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

["Shah, Amit" <aams@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Di, 2018-02-27 at 17:07 +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +0000, Amit Shah wrote:
> > 
> > In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated irqs.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message groups")
> > Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi <mirhadih@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Liu Shuo <shuo.a.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <aams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev
> > *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> >  
> >     ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
> >     if (ret < 0)
> > -           goto error_irq;
> > +           goto error_desc;
> >  out:
> >     mutex_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> >     return irq;
> >  error_irq:
> > +   while (--nvec >= i)
> > +           xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> > +error_desc:
> >     while (i > 0) {
> >             i--;
> >             __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
> It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to fix
> something that can be fixed with a single label and a single loop,
> this just makes the code more complex for no reason.

I disagree, just because there are two different cleanups to be made
for two different issues; it's not as if the if.. and else conditions
are going to be interleaved.

Anyway it's a matter of taste.

Since you've already proposed the patch, would you mind baking a proper
one and posting it?

Thanks!


> IMHO the way to solve this issue is:
> 
> while (nvec--) {
>       if (nvec >= i)
>               xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
>       else
>               __unbind_from_irq(irq + nvec);
> }

                                Amit

Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel