[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu: replace "" with <> in headers
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:19:22PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:46:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Our current scheme is to use > > #include "" > > for internal headers, and > > #include <> > > for external ones. > > > > Unfortunately this is not based on compiler support: from C point of > > view, the "" form merely looks up headers in the current directory > > and then falls back on <> directories. > > > > Thus, for example, a system header trace.h - should it be present - will > > conflict with our local trace.h > > If our local "trace.h" is in the current directory, then using "" > is right and you can still use <trace.h> to get the system version. > > If our local trace.h is in include/ top level, then it is going to > block use of the system trace.h regardless of whether we use <> or "" > > Fortunately our include/ tree uses sub-dirs, so we would typically > use #include "$subdir/trace.h" and #include <trace.h> would still > find the system header. > We just have to be careful we don't add stuff at the top level of > our include/ dir with names that are liable to clash. This might > suggest renaming include/elf.h to include/qemu/elf.h, or just > moving elf.h to the qemu/ subdirectory. Likewise include/glib-compat.h > might be better moved to qemu/ subdirectory. > This is exactly what this patch proposes, with a uniform scheme: start everything with qemu/. > > > As another example of problems, a header by the same name in the source > > directory will always be picked up first - before any headers in > > the include directory. > > There's only a couple of headers in the top level of our include/ > directory - everything else is pulled in with a named path > eg #include "block/block_int.h", so that would not conflict with > reference to a bare #include "block_int.h" from the current directory. We can not know that there are no system headers that start with block/ on any current or future systems. > > Let's change the scheme: make sure all headers that are not > > in the source directory are included through a path > > starting with qemu/ , thus: > > > > #include <> > > > > headers in the same directory as source are included with > > > > #include "" > > > > as per standard. > > As stated before, I consider this a step backwards - it is a > good clear standard to use "" for project local includes and > <> for 3rd party / system includes IMHO. The change doesn't > do anything beneficial for the two scenarios described above > AFAICT. I think you are mistaken on the last point: 1. Everything will be under qemu/ so we never clash with a system file 2. A local stale file anywhere in source directory is completely ignored since source is not on -I path. I hope this clarifies things. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |