[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] drm/xen-front: Add support for Xen PV display frontend
- To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxx, daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx, seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:46:56 +0300
- Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:47:22 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 03/26/2018 11:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:54:49PM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
My apologies, but I found a few more things that look strange and should
be cleaned up. Sorry for this iterative review approach, but I think we're
slowly getting there.
Thank you for reviewing!
Cheers, Daniel
---
+static int xen_drm_drv_dumb_create(struct drm_file *filp,
+ struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private;
+ struct drm_gem_object *obj;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = xen_drm_front_gem_dumb_create(filp, dev, args);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail;
+
+ obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(filp, args->handle);
+ if (!obj) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto fail_destroy;
+ }
+
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
You can't drop the reference while you keep using the object, someone else
might sneak in and destroy your object. The unreference always must be
last.
Will fix, thank you
+
+ /*
+ * In case of CONFIG_DRM_XEN_FRONTEND_CMA gem_obj is constructed
+ * via DRM CMA helpers and doesn't have ->pages allocated
+ * (xendrm_gem_get_pages will return NULL), but instead can provide
+ * sg table
+ */
+ if (xen_drm_front_gem_get_pages(obj))
+ ret = xen_drm_front_dbuf_create_from_pages(
+ drm_info->front_info,
+ xen_drm_front_dbuf_to_cookie(obj),
+ args->width, args->height, args->bpp,
+ args->size,
+ xen_drm_front_gem_get_pages(obj));
+ else
+ ret = xen_drm_front_dbuf_create_from_sgt(
+ drm_info->front_info,
+ xen_drm_front_dbuf_to_cookie(obj),
+ args->width, args->height, args->bpp,
+ args->size,
+ xen_drm_front_gem_get_sg_table(obj));
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_destroy;
+
The above also has another race: If you construct an object, then it must
be fully constructed by the time you publish it to the wider world. In gem
this is done by calling drm_gem_handle_create() - after that userspace can
get at your object and do nasty things with it in a separate thread,
forcing your driver to Oops if the object isn't fully constructed yet.
That means you need to redo this code here to make sure that the gem
object is fully set up (including pages and sg tables) _before_ anything
calls drm_gem_handle_create().
You are correct, I need to rework this code
This probably means you also need to open-code the cma side, by first
calling drm_gem_cma_create(), then doing any additional setup, and finally
doing the registration to userspace with drm_gem_handle_create as the very
last thing.
Although I tend to avoid open-coding, but this seems the necessary measure
here
Alternativet is to do the pages/sg setup only when you create an fb (and
drop the pages again when the fb is destroyed), but that requires some
refcounting/locking in the driver.
Not sure this will work: nothing prevents you from attaching multiple FBs to
a single dumb handle
So, not only ref-counting should be done here, but I also need to check if
the dumb buffer,
we are attaching to, has been created already
No, you must make sure that no dumb buffer can be seen by anyone else
before it's fully created. If you don't register it in the file_priv idr
using drm_gem_handle_create, no one else can get at your buffer. Trying to
paper over this race from all the other places breaks the gem core code
design, and is also much more fragile.
Yes, this is what I implement now, e.g. I do not create
any dumb handle until GEM is fully created. I was just
saying that alternative way when we do pages/sgt on FB
attach will not work in my case
So, I will rework with open-coding some stuff from CMA helpers
Aside: There's still a lot of indirection and jumping around which makes
the code a bit hard to follow.
Probably I am not sure of which indirection we are talking about, could you
please
specifically mark those annoying you?
I think it's the same indirection we talked about last time, it still
annoys me. But it's still ok if you prefer this way I think :-)
Ok, probably this is because I'm looking at the driver
from an editor, but you are from your mail client ;)
+
+static void xen_drm_drv_release(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private;
+ struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info = drm_info->front_info;
+
+ drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
+ drm_mode_config_cleanup(dev);
+
+ xen_drm_front_evtchnl_free_all(front_info);
+ dbuf_free_all(&front_info->dbuf_list);
+
+ drm_dev_fini(dev);
+ kfree(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Free now, as this release could be not due to rmmod, but
+ * due to the backend disconnect, making drm_info hang in
+ * memory until rmmod
+ */
+ devm_kfree(&front_info->xb_dev->dev, front_info->drm_info);
+ front_info->drm_info = NULL;
+
+ /* Tell the backend we are ready to (re)initialize */
+ xenbus_switch_state(front_info->xb_dev, XenbusStateInitialising);
This needs to be in the unplug code. Yes that means you'll have multiple
drm_devices floating around, but that's how hotplug works. That would also
mean that you need to drop the front_info pointer from the backend at
unplug time.
If you don't like those semantics then the only other option is to never
destroy the drm_device, but only mark the drm_connector as disconnected
when the xenbus backend is gone. But this half-half solution here where
you hotunplug the drm_device but want to keep it around still doesn't work
from a livetime pov.
I'll try to play with this:
on backend disconnect I will do the following:
drm_dev_unplug(dev)
xen_drm_front_evtchnl_free_all(front_info);
dbuf_free_all(&front_info->dbuf_list);
devm_kfree(&front_info->xb_dev->dev, front_info->drm_info);
front_info->drm_info = NULL;
xenbus_switch_state(front_info->xb_dev, XenbusStateInitialising);
on drm_driver.release callback:
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
drm_mode_config_cleanup(dev);
drm_dev_fini(dev);
kfree(dev);
Does the above make sense?
I think so, yes.
Great
One nit: Since you need to call devm_kfree either pick a
different struct device that has the correct lifetime, or switch to the
normal kmalloc/kfree versions.
Sure, I just copy-pasted from the existing patch with devm_
so we can discuss
+static struct xenbus_driver xen_driver = {
+ .ids = xen_driver_ids,
+ .probe = xen_drv_probe,
+ .remove = xen_drv_remove,
I still don't understand why you have both the remove and fini versions of
this. See other comments, I think the xenbus vs. drm_device lifetime stuff
still needs to be cleaned up some more. This shouldn't be that hard
really.
Or maybe I'm just totally misunderstanding this frontend vs. backend split
in xen, so if you have a nice gentle intro text for why that exists, it
might help.
Probably misunderstanding comes from the fact that it is possible if backend
dies it may still have its XenBus state set to connected, thus
displback_disconnect callback will never be called. For that reason on rmmod
I call fini for the DRM driver to destroy it.
+ /*
+ * pflip_timeout is set to current jiffies once we send a page flip and
+ * reset to 0 when we receive frame done event from the backed.
+ * It is checked during drm_connector_helper_funcs.detect_ctx to detect
+ * time-outs for frame done event, e.g. due to backend errors.
+ *
+ * This must be protected with front_info->io_lock, so races between
+ * interrupt handler and rest of the code are properly handled.
+ */
+ unsigned long pflip_timeout;
+
+ bool conn_connected;
I'm pretty sure this doesn't work. Especially the check in display_check
confuses me, if there's ever an error then you'll never ever be able to
display anything again, except when someone disables the display.
That was the idea to allow dummy user-space to get an error in
display_check and close, going through display_disable.
Yes, compositors will die in this case.
If you want to signal errors with the output then this must be done
through the new link-status property and
drm_mode_connector_set_link_status_property. Rejecting kms updates in
display_check with -EINVAL because the hw has a temporary issue is kinda
not cool (because many compositors just die when this happens). I thought
we agreed already to remove that, sorry for not spotting that in the
previous version.
Unfortunatelly, there is little software available which will benefit
from this out of the box. I am specifically interested in embedded
use-cases, e.g. Android (DRM HWC2 - doesn't support hotplug, HWC1.4 doesn't
support link status), Weston (no device hotplug, but connectors and
outputs).
Other software, like kmscube, modetest will not handle that as well.
So, such software will hang forever until killed.
Then you need to fix your userspace. You can't invent new uapi which will
break existing compositors like this.
I have hotplug in the driver for connectors now, so no new UAPI
Also I thought you've fixed the
"hangs forever" by sending out the uevent in case the backend disappears
or has an error. That's definitely something that should be fixed, current
userspace doesn't expect that events never get delivered.
I do, I was just saying that modetest/kmscube doesn't
handle hotplug events, so they can't understand that the
connector is gone
Some of the conn_connected checks also look a bit like they should be
replaced by drm_dev_is_unplugged instead, but I'm not sure.
I believe you are talking about drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs?
Do you mean I have to put drm_dev_is_unplugged in display_enable,
display_disable and display_update callbacks?
Yes. Well, as soon as Noralf's work has landed they'll switch to a
drm_dev_enter/exit pair, but same idea.
Good, during the development I am probably seeing same
races because of this, e.g. I only have drm_dev_is_unplugged
as my tool which is not enough
+static int connector_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
+ struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
+ bool force)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_drm_pipeline *pipeline =
+ to_xen_drm_pipeline(connector);
+ struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info = pipeline->drm_info->front_info;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* check if there is a frame done event time-out */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ if (pipeline->pflip_timeout &&
+ time_after_eq(jiffies, pipeline->pflip_timeout)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Frame done event timed-out\n");
+
+ pipeline->pflip_timeout = 0;
+ pipeline->conn_connected = false;
+ xen_drm_front_kms_send_pending_event(pipeline);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
If you want to check for timeouts please use a worker, don't piggy-pack on
top of the detect callback.
Ok, will have a dedicated work for that. The reasons why I put this into the
detect callback were:
- the periodic worker is already there, and I do nothing heavy
in this callback
- if frame done has timed out it most probably means that
backend has gone, so 10 sec period of detect timeout is also ok: thus I
don't
need to schedule a work each page flip which could be a bit costly
So, probably I will also need a periodic work (or kthread/timer) for frame
done time-outs
Yes, please create your own timer/worker for this, stuffing random other
things into existing workers makes the locking hierarchy more complicated
for everyone. And it's confusing for core devs trying to understand what
your driver does :-)
Will do
Most drivers have piles of timers/workers doing various stuff, they're
real cheap.
+static int connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
+ struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_drm_pipeline *pipeline =
+ to_xen_drm_pipeline(connector);
+
+ if (mode->hdisplay != pipeline->width)
+ return MODE_ERROR;
+
+ if (mode->vdisplay != pipeline->height)
+ return MODE_ERROR;
+
+ return MODE_OK;
+}
mode_valid on the connector only checks probe modes. Since that is
hardcoded this doesn't do much, which means userspace can give you a wrong
mode, and you fall over.
Agree, I will remove this callback completely: I have
drm_connector_funcs.fill_modes == drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
so it will only pick my single hardcoded mode from
drm_connector_helper_funcs.get_modes
callback (connector_get_modes).
No, you still need your mode_valid check. Userspace can ignore your mode
list and give you something totally different. But it needs to be moved to
the drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs vtable.
Just to make sure we are on the same page: I just move connector_mode_valid
as is to drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs, right?
You need to use one of the other mode_valid callbacks instead,
drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs has the one you should use.
Not sure I understand why do I need to provide a callback here?
For simple KMS the drm_simple_kms_crtc_mode_valid callback is used,
which always returns MODE_OK if there is no .mode_valid set for the pipe.
As per my understanding drm_simple_kms_crtc_mode_valid is only called for
modes, which were collected by drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
so I assume each time .validate_mode is called it can only have my hardcoded
mode to validate?
Please read the kerneldoc again, userspace can give you modes that are not
coming from drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes. If the kerneldoc
isn't clear, then please submit a patch to make it clearer.
It is all clear
+
+static int display_check(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
+ struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
+ struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_drm_pipeline *pipeline =
+ to_xen_drm_pipeline(pipe);
+
+ return pipeline->conn_connected ? 0 : -EINVAL;
As mentioned, this -EINVAL here needs to go. Since you already have a
mode_valid callback you can (should) drop this one here entirely.
Not sure how mode_valid is relevant to this code [1]: This function is
called
in the check phase of an atomic update, specifically when the underlying
plane is checked. But, anyways: the reason for this callback and it
returning
-EINVAL is primarialy for a dumb user-space which cannot handle hotplug
events.
Fix your userspace. Again, you can't invent new uapi like this which ends
up being inconsistent with other existing userspace.
In ideal world - yes, we have to fix existing software ;)
But, as you mentioned before, it will make most compositors die, so I will
remove this
Yup, sounds good.
Cheers, Daniel
Thank you,
Oleksandr
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
